9911796707
|
Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2023 (2) TMI 632 - AT - Income TaxAssessment order u/s 153A - Addition of cash deposit in the bank account of the assessee - HELD THAT - It is an undisputed fact that the addition was made by the Assessing Officer pursuant to the details of bank account furnished by the assesseeThere is not even a whisper of any incriminating material to justify the addition. The facts of the case are squarely covered by the decision of Kabul Chawla 2015 (9) TMI 80 - DELHI HIGH COURT and Meeta Gutgutia Prop. M/s. Ferns N Petals 2017 (5) TMI 1224 - DELHI HIGH COURT holding that the invocation of Section 153A by the Revenue was without any legal basis as there was no incriminating material qua each of those AYs. - Decided in favour of assessee.
Issues Involved:
1. Legality of addition of Rs. 1,50,000/- as income from undisclosed sources without incriminating material. 2. Application of legal precedents in the context of Section 153A of the Income-tax Act, 1961. Issue-wise Detailed Analysis: 1. Legality of Addition of Rs. 1,50,000/- without Incriminating Material: The primary grievance of the assessee was the confirmation of the addition of Rs. 1,50,000/- being a cash deposit in the bank account, which the Assessing Officer (AO) included as income from undisclosed sources during the assessment under Section 153A of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The assessee argued that this addition was made without any incriminating material found during the search. The facts of the case reveal that the assessee filed her return of income on 31.03.2014, declaring a total income of Rs. 1,91,640/-. No notice under Section 143(2) was served within the prescribed period, leading to the conclusion that the returned income was accepted. A search conducted on 20.04.2017 resulted in the discovery of a bank locker key, leading to the issuance of statutory notices under Section 153A. The AO, during scrutiny, noticed a cash deposit of Rs. 1,50,000/- in the assessee's IDBI Bank account, which the assessee explained as old savings. The AO dismissed this explanation and made the addition as income from undisclosed sources. The assessee challenged this addition before the CIT(A), but the challenge was unsuccessful. The assessee then contended before the Tribunal that the addition was devoid of any reference to incriminating material found during the search, citing the legal precedent set by the Hon'ble Jurisdictional High Court in the case of Kabul Chawla (380 ITR 573). 2. Application of Legal Precedents in the Context of Section 153A: The Tribunal referred to the legal position established by the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi in multiple judgments, including Kabul Chawla and Meeta Gutgutia (Prop. M/s. Ferns N Petals). The relevant findings from these judgments were summarized, emphasizing that: - Additions under Section 153A should be based on evidence found during the search or post-search material related to the seized evidence. - In the absence of incriminating material, completed assessments can only be reiterated, and additions should not be arbitrary or unrelated to the seized material. The Tribunal noted that the addition of Rs. 1,50,000/- was made based on the bank account details furnished by the assessee, with no incriminating material justifying the addition. The Tribunal cited the consistent legal position across various High Courts, including Gujarat, Rajasthan, Karnataka, and Calcutta, which concurred with the decision in Kabul Chawla. These courts held that additions in assessments under Section 153A must be based on incriminating material found during the search. The Tribunal also distinguished the present case from the decision in Dayawanti Gupta, where the assessee admitted to not maintaining regular books of accounts and engaging in unaccounted transactions. In contrast, the assessee in the present case maintained regular books of accounts, and the addition was not based on any incriminating material. Conclusion: Respectfully following the decision of the Hon'ble Jurisdictional High Court, the Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to delete the addition of Rs. 1,50,000/-. Consequently, the appeal of the assessee was allowed. Result: The appeal of the assessee in ITA No. 628/DEL/2022 was allowed, and the order was pronounced in the open court on 02.02.2023.
|
