Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Customs Customs + AT Customs - 2023 (5) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2023 (5) TMI 938 - AT - Customs


Issues Involved:
1. Classification of imported aluminous cement.
2. Entitlement to benefit under Notification No. 21/2002-Cus and Notification No. 12/2012-Cus.
3. Allegations of mis-declaration and imposition of penalties.

Summary:

1. Classification of Imported Aluminous Cement:
The primary issue was whether the imported aluminous cement should be classified under CTH 25233000 or CTH 25239020. The revenue argued that the cement should be classified as High Alumina Refractory Cement (CTH 25239020) due to its alumina content being 40% and above. The Tribunal referenced a similar case, Vesuvius India Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Customs, where it was held that aluminous cement, regardless of its alumina content, should be classified under CTH 25233000. The Tribunal concluded that the correct classification for the imported aluminous cement is under CTH 25233000.

2. Entitlement to Benefit Under Notification No. 21/2002-Cus and Notification No. 12/2012-Cus:
The respondents claimed the benefit of these notifications for their imported aluminous cement. The Tribunal noted that the exemption is available for any high alumina cement falling under Chapter 25, without distinguishing between high and low alumina cement. Since the imported cement was used for manufacturing refractory bricks and fell under Chapter 25, the Tribunal held that the respondents were entitled to the benefit of the cited notifications.

3. Allegations of Mis-Declaration and Imposition of Penalties:
The revenue alleged that the respondents mis-declared the imported cement to avail the exemption benefits. However, the Tribunal found that the respondents had consistently declared the alumina content and provided all necessary documents, including certificates of quality. The Tribunal ruled that merely claiming a wrong classification does not amount to mis-declaration. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the penalties and confiscation orders, stating there was no mis-declaration and the respondents were entitled to the exemption notification.

Conclusion:
The Tribunal upheld the impugned order, confirming the classification of the imported aluminous cement under CTH 25233000 and entitling the respondents to the benefit of Notification No. 21/2002-Cus and subsequent notifications. The appeals filed by the Revenue were dismissed.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates