Issues involved: Price fixation in customs valuation, comparison of invoices, relevance of supplier-importer relationship in determining price.
Summary: The case involved the appellant seeking clearance of imported goods at a price of US $1.80 CIF per piece, which was challenged by the Department based on a comparison with another importer's price of US $2.20 CIF per piece. The appellant provided evidence of negotiations with the supplier to arrive at the price. Despite this, the Department valued the goods at US $2.20 CIF per piece. The Tribunal upheld this decision, leading to the appeal.
The Supreme Court noted that while it generally avoids interfering in price fixation matters, it emphasized the importance of considering the relationship between the supplier and importer. The Court highlighted the negotiations between the supplier and the appellant, showing that the price of US $1.80 per piece was reached after discussions and considering the appellant as an old and valued customer. The Court found it unjustified to ignore this relationship and instead focus on a different importer's price. Ultimately, the Court allowed the appeal, overturning the Department's decision and discharging the show cause notice.
In conclusion, the Court emphasized the significance of the supplier-importer relationship in customs valuation and stressed that mere comparison of prices without considering such factors may lead to incorrect conclusions.
9911796707
