1977 (5) TMI 22 - SC - Central Excise

Summary

Issues:
1. Interpretation of exemption notification dated 30th April, 1975 under Rule 8 of the Central Excise Rules.
2. Liability to pay excise duty on parts used in repair of old transformers.
3. Consideration of impact of exemption notification by the Tribunal.

Detailed Analysis:
The judgment by the Supreme Court involved an appeal against the order of the Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal. The appellant contended that it was only repairing old transformers, not manufacturing them, a claim accepted by the Tribunal. Additionally, the appellant argued it was entitled to an exemption under a notification dated 30th April, 1975, exempting excise duty on goods used in the factory where they were manufactured. The Tribunal, however, did not discuss the notification's applicability to the case, leading to a clarification application by the appellant.

The Tribunal, in response to the clarification application, reiterated that the repair of transformers did not amount to 'manufacture' and held that excise duty was payable on the value of spare parts manufactured and used in old transformers. The Tribunal's failure to consider the impact of the exemption notification and provide a conclusive decision led to the appellant's dissatisfaction. The appellant argued that the Tribunal should have assessed whether the appellant was liable to pay excise duty on parts used in repairing old transformers in light of the exemption notification.

During the proceedings, it was noted that the Tribunal did not counter the appellant's claim of entitlement to the benefit of the exemption notification. The Supreme Court held that the notification applied to goods manufactured in a factory and used in the same factory, which included parts used by the appellant in repairing old transformers. Furthermore, parts purchased from the market on which excise duty had already been paid did not attract an additional duty.

Ultimately, the Supreme Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the Tribunal's order and ruling that the appellant was not liable to pay excise duty on parts used in repairing old transformers. The judgment emphasized the Tribunal's duty to consider the impact of relevant notifications and provide a clear decision based on the applicable laws and regulations.