Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + AT Income Tax - 2023 (12) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2023 (12) TMI 270 - AT - Income Tax


Issues Involved:

1. Disallowance of foreign exchange loss under Section 43A of the Income Tax Act.
2. Disallowance under Section 14A read with Rule 8D.

Summary:

1. Disallowance of Foreign Exchange Loss under Section 43A:

The assessee contended that the foreign exchange loss of Rs. 48,23,924 incurred due to advance settlement of payment by letter of credit before receipt of fixed assets should not be disallowed under Section 43A. The assessee argued that the loss had no direct nexus with the acquisition of fixed assets and should be treated as revenue expenditure. The Assessing Officer (AO) and CIT(A) treated the loss as capital in nature, relying on judgments from the Supreme Court in cases like Woodward Governor Ltd., Tata Locomotive and Engineering Co. Ltd., and Sutlej Cotton Mills Pvt. Ltd. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, stating that the loss suffered was directly linked to the purchase of fixed assets, which is capital in nature. The AO was directed to give the benefit of depreciation as per Section 32 of the IT Act.

2. Disallowance under Section 14A read with Rule 8D:

The assessee challenged the disallowance of Rs. 4,69,055 under Section 14A, arguing that only investments yielding exempt income should be considered for disallowance under Rule 8D(2)(iii). The CIT(A) had restricted the disallowance to Rs. 4,69,055 but did not fully consider the issue as per Rule 8D(2)(iii). The Tribunal, following the Delhi High Court's judgment in ACB India Ltd. v. ACIT, held that only investments that generated exempt income should be considered for disallowance under Section 14A. The Tribunal deleted the disallowance made under Section 14A, amounting to Rs. 4,69,055, and allowed the appeal for statistical purposes.

Conclusion:

The appeal filed by the assessee was allowed for statistical purposes, with directions to the AO to give the benefit of depreciation for the foreign exchange loss and to reconsider the disallowance under Section 14A by considering only investments that generated exempt income.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates