Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Service Tax Service Tax + AT Service Tax - 2024 (1) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2024 (1) TMI 520 - AT - Service Tax


Issues Involved:
1. Whether the maintenance charges collected by Gujarat Industrial Development Corporation (GIDC) are liable for service tax under "Management Maintenance or Repairing Services".
2. The applicability of the Supreme Court judgment in Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti vs. CCE & ST to the present case.
3. Interpretation of statutory levy and its implications on service tax applicability.

Summary:

Issue 1: Liability of Maintenance Charges for Service Tax
The GIDC, an undertaking of the Government of Gujarat, collects charges for maintenance and common facilities, which the department categorizes as taxable under "Management Maintenance or Repairing Services" per Section 65(64) of the Finance Act, 1994. The Tribunal previously allowed the appeal, citing the Bombay High Court's decision in Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation, which held that such charges are not subject to service tax.

Issue 2: Applicability of Supreme Court Judgment in Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti Case
The Supreme Court remanded the matter to the Tribunal, directing it to consider the implications of its judgment in Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti vs. CCE & ST. The Court clarified that activities performed by sovereign/public authorities under statutory obligations, where fees are deposited into the Government Treasury, are not taxable. However, if the service is discretionary and not a statutory obligation, it is taxable.

Issue 3: Interpretation of Statutory Levy
The Tribunal examined Rule 13 of the Disposal of Property Regulations, 1967, issued under Section 54 of the GID Act, 1962, which mandates that service charges must be paid by the hirer to the corporation until a local authority takes over. The Tribunal concluded that since these charges are mandatory, they constitute a statutory levy, and thus, no service tax is chargeable, aligning with the Supreme Court's interpretation in the Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti case.

Conclusion:
The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and allowed the appeal, ruling that the maintenance charges collected by GIDC are a statutory levy and not liable for service tax. The decision was pronounced in open court on 05.01.2024.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates