9911796707
|
Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2024 (1) TMI 757 - HC - Income TaxReopening of assessment u/s 147 - as argued no speaking order was passed by the Assessing Officer before disposing of the petitioner s objection - HELD THAT - Wide powers vested for reopening the assessment under section 148 read with section 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. It is precisely for this reason, the Hon'ble Supreme Court had held that a speaking order should be passed after the assessee is furnished with reasons for reopening of the assessment. In this case, the safeguards enunciated by the Honourable Supreme Court in GKN Drive Shafts (India) Ltd. 2002 (11) TMI 7 - SUPREME COURT has been ignored by directly passing the impugned assessment order. Therefore, impugned assessment order is therefore not sustainable. Therefore, the impugned order is set aside and the case is remitted back to the respondent to pass a fresh order disposing of the petitioner s objection in the light of the decision of Supreme Court in GKN Drive Shafts (India) Ltd. supra - Thus this exercise shall be carried out by the respondent, within a period of eight (8) weeks from the date of receipt.
Issues involved:
The judgment involves issues related to the reassessment of income tax for the assessment year 2012-13 under section 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The key issues include the determination of taxable income, disallowance under section 14A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, and the correctness of the assessment order. Issue 1: Determination of Taxable Income The petitioner challenged the impugned assessment order dated 31.12.2019, which re-determined the taxable income at Rs. 62,93,86,042. The petitioner had initially declared a taxable income of Rs. 56,13,25,680 in the Return of Income filed for the assessment year 2012-13. The Assessing Officer had earlier redetermined the taxable income as Rs. 56,66,13,640 in the scrutiny Assessment Order dated 31.03.2015 under section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Issue 2: Disallowance under Section 14A In the Assessment Order dated 31.03.2015, the Assessing Officer disallowed an amount of Rs. 52,87,967 under section 14A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 read with Rule 8D of the Income Tax Rules, 1962. The petitioner had received dividend income of Rs. 7,12,12,703 and claimed exemption under section 10(34) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The petitioner contended that section 14A was not attracted as no borrowed amount was used for the investment resulting in the dividend income. Issue 3: Reopening of Assessment The petitioner received a notice under section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, seeking to reopen the assessment for the assessment year 2012-13. The reasons for reopening the assessment included various discrepancies such as under-assessment of income under section 115JB, disallowance under section 14A, and other issues related to deductions claimed by the assessee. Judgment Summary: The High Court set aside the impugned assessment order and remitted the case back to the respondent for passing a fresh order in accordance with the decision of the Supreme Court. The Court held that a speaking order should be passed after the assessee is furnished with reasons for reopening the assessment, as per the decision in GKN Drive Shafts (India) Ltd. The impugned assessment order was deemed unsustainable due to the failure to follow the safeguards outlined by the Supreme Court. The respondent was directed to pass a fresh order within eight weeks from the date of receipt. This summary provides a detailed overview of the issues involved in the legal judgment, highlighting the key aspects related to the determination of taxable income, disallowance under section 14A, and the reopening of the assessment for the assessment year 2012-13.
|
