9911796707
|
Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2024 (1) TMI 910 - AT - Income TaxValidity of assessment dated u/s 143(3)/153A with no mandatory DIN - HELD THAT - We are of the considered view that as the assessment order does not bear DIN Number on its face and intimation admittedly has been issued separately, in view of the judgement of Brandix Mauritius Holdings Ltd. 2023 (4) TMI 579 - DELHI HIGH COURT and the order of the coordinate Bench in the case of Abhinav Chaturvedi and others 2023 (8) TMI 378 - ITAT DELHI in which one of us was also on the Bench, the assessment order before us is non est in the light of the Circular No.19/2019 of the CBDT dated 14.08.2019. Although before the ld.CIT(A) no separate ground in that regard was taken by the assessee, however, the directions of the Board being binding upon the Revenue authorities the assessment order is to be considered non est and void ab initio and as if was never issued. The effect of the assessment order not bearing DIN number is that it is considered to have never been issued, so all consequential proceedings thereupon are also vitiated qua the assessee - Decided against revenue.
Issues Involved:
1. Legality of the assessment order due to the absence of a Document Identification Number (DIN). 2. Consequences of the assessment order being incomplete when uploaded on the Income Tax Business Application (ITBA). Summary: Issue 1: Legality of the Assessment Order Due to Absence of DIN The appeal was preferred by the Revenue against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-23, New Delhi, which arose from an order passed under Section 143(3) read with Section 153A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The respondent assessee filed an application under Rule 27 of the Income-tax (Appellate Tribunal) Rules, 1963, claiming that the assessment order dated 30.03.2022 is null and void as it violated CBDT Circular No. 19/2019, which mandates a DIN for all communications. It was evident that the assessment order did not have a DIN on its face, and the DIN was issued separately. The Tribunal, referencing the judgment of the Hon'ble Delhi High Court in CIT (International Taxation) vs. Brandix Mauritius Holdings Ltd., and the order of the coordinate Bench in the case of Abhinav Chaturvedi, concluded that the assessment order is non est in light of Circular No. 19/2019 of the CBDT. The Circular mandates that no communication shall be issued by any income tax authority without a computer-generated DIN, except in exceptional circumstances, which must be documented with prior written approval. Any communication not in conformity with this requirement is deemed invalid and considered never issued. The Tribunal noted that the assessment order did not mention the reasons for manual issuance or the requisite approval, thus failing to comply with the Circular. Issue 2: Consequences of the Assessment Order Being Incomplete When Uploaded on ITBAThe Tribunal observed that the assessment order was passed manually and uploaded on ITBA later, with the DIN generated subsequently. The instructions from the Directorate of Income Tax (System) require that the DIN must be generated and quoted on the document before it is signed and uploaded. The Tribunal emphasized that the assessment can be considered 'made' only when the DIN is quoted on the order before it is signed. The subsequent intimation of DIN generation is not part of the assessment order itself. Therefore, the absence of a DIN on the assessment order at the time of signing renders it non-est. Since the assessment order did not conform to the mandatory requirements of the Circular and instructions, it was considered void ab initio, with all consequential proceedings vitiated. The Tribunal, exercising its power under Section 254(1) of the Act, set aside the assessment order and dismissed the Revenue's appeal. Order pronounced in the open court on 30.11.2023.
|
