9911796707
|
Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2023 (3) TMI 1519 - AT - Income TaxTaxability of network fees received by the assessee as Royalty and Fees for Technical Services under the India Netherlands Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement ( DTAA ) - assessee is a company incorporated in and is a tax resident of Netherlands - HELD THAT - We find that the coordinate bench of the Tribunal in assessee s own case in Damco International BV 2022 (8) TMI 1531 - ITAT MUMBAI for the assessment year 2013-14 , held that network fees received by the assessee from Damco India are neither in the nature of Royalty nor Fees for Technical Services. DR could not show us any reason to deviate from the aforesaid decision rendered in assessee s own case and no change in facts and law was alleged in the relevant assessment year. Decided in favour of assessee.
Issues Involved:
1. Taxability of network fees as "Royalty" and "Fees for Technical Services" under the India-Netherlands DTAA and the Income Tax Act, 1961. 2. Levy of surcharge and education cess on tax computed under Article 12(2) of the India-Netherlands DTAA. 3. Levy of interest under section 234D and recovery of interest granted under section 244A of the Income Tax Act. 4. Initiation of penalty proceedings under section 270A(2) of the Income Tax Act. Issue-wise Detailed Analysis: 1. Taxability of Network Fees as "Royalty" and "Fees for Technical Services" under the India-Netherlands DTAA and the Income Tax Act, 1961: The assessee, a company incorporated in and a tax resident of the Netherlands, engaged in logistics and freight forwarding, received network fees from Damco India Private Ltd. The Assessing Officer (AO) treated these fees as "Fees for Technical Services" under the India-Netherlands DTAA and the Income Tax Act. The assessee contended that the network fees were business receipts not taxable in India due to the absence of a Permanent Establishment (PE) in India, as per Article 7 of the India-Netherlands DTAA. The AO, however, held that the services provided were managerial and technical, thus qualifying as "Fees for Technical Services" and "Royalty". The Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP) upheld the AO's decision, following its directions in earlier years. The Tribunal, referencing its decision in the assessee's case for the preceding year, held that the network fees were neither "Royalty" nor "Fees for Technical Services" and directed the AO to delete the addition. The Tribunal noted that the network fees were based on surplus profits and did not involve the transfer of technical know-how. 2. Levy of Surcharge and Education Cess on Tax Computed under Article 12(2) of the India-Netherlands DTAA: Given the Tribunal's decision on the primary issue of network fees not being taxable as "Royalty" or "Fees for Technical Services", the issues of surcharge and education cess on such tax were rendered academic and required no separate adjudication. 3. Levy of Interest under Section 234D and Recovery of Interest Granted under Section 244A of the Income Tax Act: The Tribunal noted that the issues of interest levied under section 234D and the recovery of interest granted under section 244A were consequential to the primary decision. Therefore, these grounds were allowed for statistical purposes. 4. Initiation of Penalty Proceedings under Section 270A(2) of the Income Tax Act: The Tribunal found the issue of initiation of penalty proceedings to be premature and thus dismissed this ground. Conclusion: The Tribunal's consolidated order for the assessment years 2018-19 and 2019-20 allowed the assessee's appeals partly for statistical purposes. The primary issue of the taxability of network fees was decided in favor of the assessee, following the precedent set in previous years. The related issues of surcharge, education cess, and interest were addressed as consequential or academic, and the initiation of penalty proceedings was dismissed as premature.
|
