2017 (8) TMI 1731 - AT - Service Tax

Levy of service tax - construction of complex services - HELD THAT - The identical issue has come up before the Tribunal in the case of M/S. RAJ CONSTRUCTION CO. VERSUS C.C.E. S.T. JAIPUR-I 2017 (7) TMI 1468 - CESTAT NEW DELHI where the ratio laid down by MACRO MARVEL PROJECTS LTD. VERSUS COMMR. OF SERVICE TAX, CHENNAI 2008 (9) TMI 80 - CESTAT, CHENNAI as well as COMMISSIONER, CENTRAL EXCISE CUSTOMS VERSUS M/S LARSEN TOUBRO LTD. AND OTHERS 2015 (8) TMI 749 - SUPREME COURT was discussed. Finally the Tribunal observed that ' the impugned order as it stands with reference to tax liability of the appellant for construction of residential complex, is not sustainable. Accordingly, that portion of the finding is set aside and the matter is remanded back to the original authority for a fresh decision'. Thus, matter remanded to the adjudicating authority to decide the issue afresh in the light of the above observation, but by providing an opportunity of hearing to the appellant - appeal allowed by way of remand.

Summary

The appeal was filed against an order-in-appeal passed by the Commissioner (Appeals-I) Central Excise, Jaipur regarding service tax on construction of residential complex services. The Tribunal set aside the finding and remanded the matter back to the original authority for a fresh decision based on legal precedents and factual details. The appellant was granted an opportunity to present their case. All appeals filed by the appellants were allowed by way of remand.