2024 (6) TMI 1397 - AT - Income Tax

Denial of relief claimed u/s 90 - delay in furnishing of Form 67 prescribed under Income Tax Rules, 1962 - HELD THAT - We notice that Form 67 has been filed with a minor delay. Copies of Form 67 are filed in the paper book furnished for each of the Assessment Years. In the decisions referred by the ld. Counsel for the assessee, we note that this Tribunal has consistently taken a view that filing of Form 67 is directory and not mandatory in nature and that the claim of FTC cannot be denied merely for late filing of Form 67 as it is merely a procedural formality. See Krishna Kumar Chaudhary 2023 (7) TMI 5 - ITAT KOLKATA Thus we find that the assessee is entitled for the alleged Foreign Tax Credit claimed in the return of income for the impugned Assessment Years. Decided in favour of assessee.

Summary

Issues:
Denial of relief claimed u/s 90 of the Income Tax Act on account of delay in furnishing Form 67 prescribed under Income Tax Rules, 1962.

Analysis:
The judgment pertains to appeals by the assessee against orders of the Commissioner of Income Tax, Appeal, Addl/JCIT(A)-10, Mumbai, regarding the denial of relief claimed under sections 90/90A of the Income Tax Act due to delay in submitting Form 67. The assessee, an individual earning income from salary in Bhutan, claimed relief under section 90 for multiple assessment years. The claim was denied initially due to a delay in furnishing Form 67, which was subsequently rectified through a rectification application under section 154. However, the appeal before the CIT(A) was dismissed due to a delay in filing the appeal, leading to the present appeal before the Tribunal.

The primary issue before the Tribunal was the denial of relief under sections 90/90A of the Act based on the delay in filing Form 67. The Tribunal noted that the assessee had obtained and e-filed Form 67 for the relevant assessment years with necessary attachments, albeit with a minor delay. The tax credit claimed by the assessee was in line with the tax paid in Bhutan, and the delay in filing the appeal was due to pursuing an alternative remedy under section 154, which was unsuccessful. The Tribunal acknowledged the bonafide nature of the delay and decided to condone it.

The Tribunal considered whether to remand the matter to the CIT(A) for adjudication or decide on the merits itself. Given the small amount of tax credit involved and to avoid further litigation, the Tribunal opted to adjudicate the appeal on its merits. Citing previous tribunal decisions, the Tribunal emphasized that filing Form 67 is procedural and not mandatory, and the denial of foreign tax credit solely based on a delay in filing Form 67 is unwarranted. The Tribunal referred to specific cases where similar issues were resolved in favor of the assessee, highlighting the procedural nature of Form 67 filing and the entitlement of the assessee to foreign tax credit.

Ultimately, the Tribunal allowed the appeals of the assessee, reversing the findings of the CIT(A) and granting the alleged Foreign Tax Credit claimed for the respective assessment years. The judgment emphasized the bonafide nature of the claim and the procedural aspect of Form 67 filing, ensuring the assessee's entitlement to the relief claimed under sections 90/90A of the Income Tax Act.