Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + AT Income Tax - 2022 (2) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2022 (2) TMI 1477 - AT - Income Tax


Issues:
Disallowance of expenditure incurred towards payment made for employees' contribution to PF & ESI fund.

Analysis:
The appeal was filed against the order of the Ld. CIT(A), NFAC, Delhi regarding the disallowance of expenditure incurred for employees' contribution to PF & ESI fund, despite being remitted within the due date of filing the income tax return for AY 2019-20. The Memorandum Explaining the Provisions in Finance Bill, 2021 clarified the issue. It highlighted the distinction between employer and employee contributions to welfare funds, emphasizing that employee contributions are the employees' own money deposited by the employer. The memorandum proposed amendments to sections 36(1)(va) and 43B of the Income Tax Act, stating they would take effect from 1st April 2021.

The Tribunal noted that the employee's contribution was deducted by the assessee and remitted to the Government Treasury within the due date for filing the income tax return under the Act. Even though the amendment was clarificatory and applicable from 1st April 2021, the Tribunal ruled that for the relevant assessment year (2019-20), it was sufficient that the employee's contribution was remitted within the due date. Citing a similar decision by the Hyderabad SMC Bench in a previous case, the Tribunal directed the Ld. AO to delete the disallowance of the payment made for employees' contribution to PF & ESI fund. As a result, the appeal of the assessee was allowed.

In conclusion, the Tribunal's decision was based on the clarification provided in the Finance Bill, emphasizing the importance of timely remittance of employee contributions to welfare funds. The ruling highlighted the distinction between employer and employee contributions and upheld that the disallowance made by the Revenue Authorities was unwarranted in this case, leading to the deletion of the addition in the hands of the assessee.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates