Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + AT Income Tax - 2024 (2) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2024 (2) TMI 1501 - AT - Income Tax


1. ISSUES PRESENTED and CONSIDERED

The core legal question in this case revolves around the application of Section 56(2)(x) of the Income Tax Act, specifically whether the date of an allotment letter can be considered as the date of agreement for the purpose of determining the stamp duty value applicable to the acquisition of immovable property. The issue is whether the addition of Rs. 17,12,962/- made by the Assessing Officer (AO) under Section 56(2)(x) was justified, considering the date of acquisition as the date of agreement rather than the date of the allotment letter.

2. ISSUE-WISE DETAILED ANALYSIS

- Relevant legal framework and precedents

The legal framework in question is Section 56(2)(x) of the Income Tax Act, which stipulates that if an immovable property is acquired for a consideration less than its stamp duty value by an amount exceeding Rs. 50,000/-, the difference is taxable as income from other sources. The proviso to this section allows for the stamp duty value on the date of agreement to be considered if the consideration or part thereof is paid by specified modes on or before the date of the agreement.

- Court's interpretation and reasoning

The Tribunal examined whether the allotment letter could be considered an "agreement" for the purposes of the proviso to Section 56(2)(x). The Tribunal referred to precedents where it was held that an allotment letter could be considered as an agreement to sell, provided certain conditions were met, such as payment being made through banking channels as specified in the proviso.

- Key evidence and findings

The key evidence included the allotment letter dated 02.03.2015 and the payment of Rs. 11,00,000/- made on 06.02.2015. The AO had raised concerns about the credibility of the allotment letter, noting discrepancies such as the lack of signatures and the letter not being registered or notarized.

- Application of law to facts

The Tribunal applied the law by considering whether the conditions of the proviso to Section 56(2)(x) were met. It found that the payment was made through an account payee cheque, fulfilling one of the proviso's requirements. The Tribunal also considered precedents where similar allotment letters were treated as agreements for the purposes of the proviso.

- Treatment of competing arguments

The Tribunal considered the Revenue's arguments regarding the discrepancies in the allotment letter and its credibility. However, it gave weight to the precedents and the fact that the payment was made through a specified mode, leading to the conclusion that the proviso could apply.

- Conclusions

The Tribunal concluded that the allotment letter should be treated as an agreement for the purposes of Section 56(2)(x), and therefore, the stamp duty value on the date of the allotment letter should be considered. The addition made by the AO was not sustainable and was deleted.

3. SIGNIFICANT HOLDINGS

- Preserve verbatim quotes of crucial legal reasoning

"In assessee's case the advance payment is made through account payee check and the allotment letter with the terms of balance payment and other conditions of delivery of flat etc is issued. Therefore in our considered view, the above decision of the Hon'ble Tribunal is applicable to assessee's case also."

- Core principles established

The Tribunal established that an allotment letter can be considered as an agreement for the purposes of Section 56(2)(x) if the payment conditions specified in the proviso are met. This includes making part payment through specified banking channels before the execution of the sale agreement.

- Final determinations on each issue

The Tribunal determined that the AO's addition under Section 56(2)(x) was not justified, as the conditions of the proviso were met, and the stamp duty value on the date of the allotment letter should be considered. The appeal was allowed, and the addition was deleted.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates