9911796707
|
Home
Issues Involved:
1. Classification of "Needle Cages" or "Needle Roller Cages" under Item 49 or Item 68 of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944. Detailed Analysis: 1. Background and Previous Rulings: The main issue was whether "Needle Cages" or "Needle Roller Cages" should be classified under Item 49 or Item 68 of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 (CET). This issue had previously been addressed in the case of M/s. Needle Roller Bearing Co. Ltd., where it was determined that the goods fell under Item 68, CET. The Departmental representative argued that new material aspects warranted reconsideration of this classification under Item 49, CET. 2. Constitution of Larger Bench: The Special Bench, after hearing arguments, recommended constituting a Larger Special Bench to hear the appeals, including the appeal of M/s. Deepak Insulated Cable Corporation Ltd. The President of the Tribunal constituted a 5-Member Bench for this purpose. 3. Intervener's Application: M/s. Needle Roller Bearing Co. Ltd. sought leave to intervene in the hearing of the three appeals. The application was allowed, and the parties, including the intervener, were heard extensively. 4. Competing Tariff Items: The two competing tariff items were: - Item 49: "Rolling bearings, that is to say, ball or roller bearings all sorts." - Item 68: "All other goods, not elsewhere specified." 5. Assessees' Contention: The assessees argued that needle roller cages were only parts or components of bearings and not complete bearings. They relied on various standards and trade opinions to support their claim that needle roller cages should be classified under Item 68, CET. They emphasized that a complete needle roller bearing consisted of an outer race, inner race, cage, and needle rollers, and the disputed article was only a combination of the cage and needle rollers. 6. Department's Argument: The Departmental Representative contended that, based on IS 4216-1967 and IS 4216-1981, needle cages should be classified under Item 49, CET, as "bearings, all sorts." The Department also referred to authoritative works such as Encyclopaedia Britannica and Mark's Standard Handbook for Mechanical Engineers to support their argument. 7. Counsel's Submissions: Shri S. Ganesh, representing M/s. Deepak Insulated Cable Corporation Ltd. and the intervener, argued that no new material warranted reconsideration of the classification. The Bench had previously concluded that needle cages without an outer and inner race were not complete bearings but only components. The end-use criterion was discarded in favor of the commercial parlance test. 8. Evidence and Standards: The Bench considered various standards and expert opinions, including: - ISI Specifications and Glossary of Terms. - German Standard DIN 5407. - Customs Cooperation Council Nomenclature (C.C.C.N.). - Manufacturer's catalogues and trade opinions. - Expert opinions from Central Machine Tool Institute and other authorities. 9. Tribunal's Analysis: The Tribunal analyzed the evidence and concluded that the preponderance of literature supported the view that needle cages with rolling elements were considered components or sub-assemblies of needle rolling bearings. Item 49, CET, did not cover parts or sub-assemblies of rolling bearings. Therefore, the correct classification was under Item 68, CET. 10. Majority Decision: The majority of the Tribunal members held that needle cage assemblies consisting of needle cages with rolling elements did not constitute "rolling bearings" under Item 49, CET, and should be classified under Item 68, CET. 11. Dissenting Opinion: One member, V.T. Raghavachari, dissented, arguing that the articles served the entire purpose of needle roller bearings and should be classified under Item 49, CET. He emphasized that technological advancements had obviated the need for inner and outer races, and the articles should be classified based on their function. 12. Final Decision: The appeals were allowed with consequential relief, and the goods were classified under Item 68, CET, based on the majority view.
|
