Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Customs Customs + AT Customs - 2000 (1) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2000 (1) TMI 87 - AT - Customs

Issues:
- Denial of benefit of project import to empty Oxygen Gas Cylinders
- Interpretation of Tariff Heading 98.01 and definition of Industrial Plant under Project Imports Regulations, 1986

Analysis:

Issue 1: Denial of benefit of project import to empty Oxygen Gas Cylinders

The appellant appealed against the order-in-original denying the benefit of project import to 2520 empty Oxygen Gas Cylinders imported for setting up a gas production plant. The Revenue issued a show cause notice post-clearance, leading to the impugned order denying the benefit and confirming the demand of differential customs duty. The appellant argued that the Gas Cylinders were essential for manufacturing Oxygen Gas and were auxiliary equipment for setting up the Industrial Plant. The Revenue contended that the Gas Cylinders did not qualify as part of an Industrial Plant under the Project Imports Regulations, 1986.

Issue 2: Interpretation of Tariff Heading 98.01 and definition of Industrial Plant

The Tribunal analyzed Tariff Heading 98.01, which covers machinery, instruments, and auxiliary equipment for the initial setup of an Industrial Plant. The definition of Industrial Plant under the Project Imports Regulations, 1986 specifies it as a system necessary for manufacturing, production, or extraction of a commodity. Considering the appellant's purpose of setting up a Gas Plant for Oxygen Gas production, the Tribunal referred to a previous case where Gas Cylinders were deemed auxiliary equipment. The Tribunal concluded that Gas Cylinders were indeed auxiliary equipment essential for gas production and fell within the scope of Tariff Heading 98.01. Therefore, the impugned order denying the benefit of project import was set aside, and the appeal was allowed based on the precedent and interpretation of the relevant regulations.

This detailed analysis of the judgment highlights the key issues, arguments presented by both parties, legal interpretations of relevant regulations, and the final decision rendered by the Tribunal in favor of the appellant.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates