9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
- Confiscation of silver slabs under Customs Act - Imposition of penalties on individuals and company - Allegations of smuggling and lack of documentary evidence - Contraband recovery from premises of a company - Contention regarding Indian origin of silver slabs - Retracted statements and alleged duress during interrogation - Compliance with instructions from Central Board of Excise and Customs - Lack of foreign markings on silver slabs and disputed statements - Tribunal's decisions on foreign origin and purity of seized goods Confiscation of Silver Slabs under Customs Act: The judgment involves the confiscation of 10 pieces of silver slabs weighing 31.694 kgs under Section 111(d) of the Customs Act, 1962. The Deputy Commissioner of Customs imposed penalties on individuals and a company under Section 112 of the Customs Act, 1962, which were confirmed by the Commissioner (Appeals), leading to the appeals before the Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, Kolkata. Allegations of Smuggling and Lack of Documentary Evidence: The silver slabs were seized based on a reasonable belief of smuggling, as the individuals involved could not produce any documentary evidence to prove legal possession. The Railways Police recovered the silver slabs from five persons who admitted collecting them from Nepal, leading to the confiscation and penalties imposed by the Customs authorities. Contraband Recovery and Contention Regarding Indian Origin: Despite a search of the premises of the company allegedly involved in the smuggling, no contraband was found. The appellants contended that the silver slabs were of Indian origin, highlighting the absence of foreign markings as evidence. They also claimed that the statements relied upon by the Revenue were retracted and recorded under duress. Compliance with Instructions and Tribunal's Decisions: The appellants argued that the seizure of silver slabs, weighing less than 100 kgs, was against the instructions of the Central Board of Excise and Customs, as per a Telex Message. They relied on Tribunal decisions to support their contention that the lack of foreign markings, 100% purity, and proximity to the Pakistan border were insufficient to establish foreign origin and smuggling. Judgment and Decision: After considering the submissions, the Tribunal found that the Revenue's case was primarily based on contested statements and lacked concrete evidence of smuggling or foreign origin due to the absence of foreign markings on the silver slabs. Citing previous decisions, the Tribunal set aside the impugned order, allowing all the appeals and providing consequential relief to the appellants based on the insufficient evidence presented by the Revenue.
|
