9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
Refund applications rejection based on incorrect assessment of assessable value. Analysis: The two appeals were filed against the rejection of refund applications by the appellants, which were based on the same grounds. The appeals were taken up together and disposed of by a common order. The appellant, a manufacturer of 2 wheelers, was seeking a refund for Scooters removed from the factory to the depot and sold from there. The assessable value for these Scooters was required to be determined based on the depot sale price following the 1996 amendment of Section 4 of the Central Excise Act. The refund applications were rejected on the grounds that subsequent sale prices from the depots were not relevant for assessment purposes. The appellant contended that the refund claims were rejected erroneously, as they were based on the depot sale prices at the time of removal from the factory, not on subsequent sales prices. The appellant argued that the assessable value should be determined based on the sale price prevailing at the depot at the time of removal from the factory. The legal proposition presented by the appellant was considered well-settled, and it was noted from the records that the refund claim was not about lower subsequent sale prices from the depots but about the higher assessable value adopted at the time of stock transfer from the factory compared to the depot price on that date. The Tribunal found the appellant's claim to be in line with the legal position stated in a previous decision and directed the Original Authority to re-examine the refund applications and pass fresh orders based on the correct factual and legal positions. In conclusion, the Tribunal set aside the impugned orders, allowed the appeals by way of remand, and directed a re-examination of the refund applications to determine the correct assessable value based on the depot sale price at the time of removal from the factory.
|
