Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 2003 (10) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2003 (10) TMI 241 - AT - Central Excise

Issues: Duty credit on naphtha used in electricity generation, demand of duty on wasted electricity, reversal of credit on naphtha used in electricity production, identification of electricity generated by specific fuel for credit reversal.

In this judgment by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai, the appellant, engaged in manufacturing plastic raw material, also operated a plant for co-generation of electricity and steam using naphtha, natural gas, or high-speed oil as raw materials. The Commissioner demanded duty on the naphtha used in generating electricity that was fed into the grid of the Gujarat Electricity Board. The appellant argued that the electricity wastage should not incur duty as it was not utilizable due to circumstances beyond control, citing a previous judgment concerning waste electricity. The Tribunal agreed, stating that the duty credit on naphtha used for generating such waste electricity need not be reversed, as per Rule 57D concerning waste inputs in the manufacturing process.

Regarding the sale of electricity, the appellant contended that the electricity sold was not solely produced using naphtha, but a mix of natural gas and high-speed diesel oil. As it was impossible to identify the exact source of the sold electricity due to simultaneous generation from multiple turbines using different fuels, the Tribunal ruled in favor of limiting the credit reversal to the quantity notionally attributed to naphtha-generated electricity. The matter was remanded to the Commissioner for this specific credit reversal.

Ultimately, the appeal was allowed, and the impugned order demanding duty on naphtha used in electricity generation was set aside. The Tribunal provided consequential relief to the appellant, emphasizing the need for credit reversal only on the portion of electricity notionally linked to naphtha.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates