Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 2004 (8) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2004 (8) TMI 201 - AT - Central Excise


Issues Involved:
The issues involved in this case include the eligibility of Modvat credit on coal bunkers and its accessories, chequered plates/hard plates, columns of heavy fabricated structures and bracings, and HR coils under specific sub-headings during the relevant periods.

Eligibility of Modvat Credit on Coal Bunkers and Accessories:
The appellants claimed Modvat credit on coal bunkers and its parts with accessories under Rule 57Q of Central Excise Rules. The Commissioner (Appeals) denied the credit stating that coal bunkers are used for temporary storage of crushed coal in boilers, but are not considered as parts of boilers or power plants. The appellants argued that coal bunkers were essential for boiler operation and relied on relevant decisions. However, the Tribunal found that coal bunkers were not part of the boiler and upheld the denial of Modvat credit on coal bunkers and its accessories.

Eligibility of Modvat Credit on Chequered Plates/Hard Plates:
Regarding chequered plates/hard plates, the appellants claimed these were used as components of machinery and sought Modvat credit. However, the Tribunal determined that these plates were general-purpose items with multifarious uses and not specifically identified as components/spares or accessories of machinery. The Tribunal found no evidence to support the claim that these plates were component parts of machinery, thus upholding the Commissioner (Appeals) decision to deny Modvat credit on chequered plates/hard plates.

Denial of Credit on Columns of Heavy Fabricated Structures and Bracings:
The denial of Modvat credit on columns of heavy fabricated structures and bracings was based on the finding that these items were construction materials rather than capital goods. The Tribunal agreed with the lower authorities that these structures did not qualify as capital goods under Rule 57Q, as they were not considered components, spares, or accessories of machinery. Citing previous decisions, the Tribunal upheld the denial of Modvat credit on columns and bracings.

Denial of Credit on HR Coils:
The appellants sought Modvat credit on HR coils used for fabrication of pipelines, but the lower authorities denied the credit, stating that HR coils were general-purpose items with multifarious uses and not specifically identified as capital goods. The Tribunal concurred with the denial, noting that HR coils did not meet the criteria under Rule 57Q for capital goods eligibility. The Commissioner (Appeals) suggested the appellants pursue the matter separately if HR coils could be considered as inputs, but upheld the denial of Modvat credit on HR coils.

In conclusion, the Tribunal rejected all three appeals, affirming the denial of Modvat credit on coal bunkers and accessories, chequered plates/hard plates, columns of heavy fabricated structures and bracings, and HR coils based on their respective eligibility criteria under Rule 57Q of the Central Excise Rules.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates