Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 2004 (10) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2004 (10) TMI 178 - AT - Central Excise

Issues involved:
Classification of product under Heading 27.10 or Heading 38.14 of the Central Excise Tariff Act.

Analysis:
The appeal in question pertains to the classification of a product manufactured by M/s. Tuftween Petrochemical Ltd. The primary issue is whether the product should be classified under Heading 27.10 as claimed by the Revenue or under Heading 38.14 as claimed by the respondents. The product in question is an organic composite solvent obtained by mixing raw materials in various ratios under room temperature and pressure. The Deputy Commissioner initially classified the product under sub-heading 2710.19 of the Tariff, confirming duty demand based on the composition of inputs. However, the Commissioner (Appeals) set aside this classification, emphasizing that the product must meet specific criteria to be classified under Heading 27.10.

The Commissioner (Appeals) highlighted three key criteria for classification under Heading 27.10: the product must be a hydrocarbon oil, have a flash point below 25 degrees Celsius, and be suitable for use as fuel in spark ignition engines. Referring to a Tribunal decision in a similar case, it was noted that evidence of suitability for use as fuel is crucial for classification under Heading 27.10. In this instance, the Revenue failed to provide any material demonstrating the product's suitability for use in spark ignition engines. The Commissioner (Appeals) rightly concluded that without such evidence, the product cannot be classified under Heading 27.10, even if it predominantly contains inputs specified under the heading.

The judgment underscores the importance of fulfilling the specific requirements outlined in the heading for classification purposes. Merely having predominant inputs is insufficient if the essential criteria, such as being a hydrocarbon oil with a flash point below 25 degrees Celsius and suitable for use as fuel, are not met. Therefore, the appeal by the Revenue was deemed to lack merit and was rejected based on the failure to establish the product's suitability for use in spark ignition engines, a key criterion for classification under Heading 27.10.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates