2005 (4) TMI 231 - AT - Central Excise

Summary

Issues: Contesting duty demand and penalty imposition based on alleged shortage of footwear stock without proper verification and documentation.

In this case, the appellants contested the correctness of the Order-in-Appeal, which upheld the duty demand and penalty imposed by the adjudicating authority due to an alleged shortage of footwear stock. The officers detected a shortage of 1500 pairs of footwear with MRP of Rs. 595/- and 250 pairs with MRP of Rs. 995/- on 1-6-1998. However, crucial details regarding the stock checking process remained undisclosed, and no panchnama was prepared by the officers at the spot. The only statement recorded was from the appellants' authorized signatory, who expressed inability to explain the alleged shortages. Subsequently, the appellants submitted a letter asserting no shortage and improper verification. Despite this, the Department did not verify the facts on-site. An officer later corrected the opening balance figures in the register, but did not mention any excess or shortage of specific pairs. Moreover, there was no evidence of clandestine removal of goods or shortage/excess of raw materials during the visit. The Tribunal concluded that without proper documentation and verification, the case against the appellants could not be sustained. Consequently, the impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed with consequential relief as per law.