1987 (7) TMI 139 - AT - Income Tax

Accounting Year, Carrying On Business, Cash Credits, Income From Business, Income From Other Sources

Summary

Issues: Assessment of cash amounts as income from business or profession instead of income from other sources under section 68 of the Income-tax Act, 1961.

Detailed Analysis:

1. Facts and Background: The appeals before the Appellate Tribunal ITAT BOMBAY-C involved the assessment years 1980-81 and 1981-82 concerning an individual engaged in the construction business and deriving income from salary as well. The dispute centered around the treatment of cash amounts in the trading accounts for both years, which the assessee claimed were received from parties over and above the sale agreement prices.

2. Explanation and Treatment by Assessing Officer: The Income-tax Officer treated the cash amounts as income from other sources under section 68 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, as the assessee's representative could not provide the names of the parties due to the assessee's demise. The Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) disagreed and directed the Income-tax Officer to assess the amounts as income from business, considering the nature of the business and the amounts involved.

3. Legal Provisions and Interpretation: Section 68 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, allows for charging any unexplained sum in the books of the assessee as income if the explanation provided is unsatisfactory. However, the section does not specify under which head the income should be assessed, leaving it to the assessing authority to determine based on surrounding circumstances.

4. Presumption of Income Source: In this case, the assessee had two main sources of income - salary and the business of construction and selling show-rooms. The business had a significant turnover, and the cash amounts were credited in the business's accounts. The Tribunal inferred that these amounts likely represented income from the business activities rather than from other sources.

5. Precedents and Legal Interpretation: Referring to legal precedents, the Tribunal highlighted cases where credits in business accounts were treated as business receipts even when the explanation for their receipt was rejected. The Tribunal emphasized that common practical notions should guide the categorization of income when the law is silent on the matter.

6. Decision and Rationale: Based on the principles established in relevant case laws, the Tribunal upheld the Commissioner's decision to treat the cash amounts as income from the business of construction and selling show-rooms, dismissing the department's appeals. The Tribunal found that the amounts were rightfully assessed under the head of income from business or profession rather than income from other sources.

7. Conclusion: The Tribunal's decision affirmed that the cash amounts in question were properly categorized as income from the business activities of the assessee, emphasizing the importance of practical considerations and legal precedents in determining the appropriate head under which income should be assessed.