1989 (7) TMI 154 - AT - Income Tax

2006 (8) TMI 243 - AT

Issues Involved:

1. Deletion of addition of Rs. 47,469.
2. Deletion of additions of Rs. 2,77,385 and Rs. 19,880 on account of excess bonus.
3. Deletion of addition of Rs. 30,000 on account of entertainment expenditure.
4. Relief of Rs. 3,24,231 under s. 40A(5)/40(c) of the Act.
5. Deletion of addition of Rs. 38,750 out of fees paid to consultants.
6. Deletion of addition of Rs. 44,438 on account of office expenses.
7. Deletion of addition of Rs. 1,87,000 on account of valuation of stock.
8. Allowance of bad debt claim of Rs. 63,859.
9. Allowance of reduction of Rs. 2,37,432 on account of extra shift allowance.
10. Allowance of depreciation on moulds at the rate of 40%.
11. Cross-objections by the assessee.

Detailed Analysis:

1. Deletion of Addition of Rs. 47,469:
The first issue concerns the deletion of an addition of Rs. 47,469 by the CIT(A). The assessee, a public limited company, claimed a loss on discarded assets, which the IAC initially disallowed. The CIT(A) accepted the assessee's method of consistently writing off the written-down value of discarded assets and crediting sale proceeds as income. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s findings, noting the consistent accounting method and past acceptance by the Department. Consequently, the first ground of appeal was rejected.

2. Deletion of Additions of Rs. 2,77,385 and Rs. 19,880 on Account of Excess Bonus:
The second issue involves the deletion of additions related to excess bonus payments. The CIT(A) allowed these payments as bona fide business expenditures necessary for industrial peace. The Tribunal agreed with the CIT(A), noting the settlement with employees and the applicability of the CIT vs. Sivanandha Mills Ltd. case. The second ground of appeal was thus rejected.

3. Deletion of Addition of Rs. 30,000 on Account of Entertainment Expenditure:
The third issue pertains to the deletion of Rs. 30,000 from entertainment expenses. The CIT(A) reduced the disallowance by estimating that 20% of the total entertainment expenses were incurred on employees. The Tribunal found this estimation reasonable, considering the nature and extent of the assessee's business. The third ground of appeal was dismissed.

4. Relief of Rs. 3,24,231 under s. 40A(5)/40(c) of the Act:
The fourth issue concerns the relief of Rs. 3,24,231 under s. 40A(5)/40(c). The CIT(A) excluded medical reimbursement and other expenses from the disallowance calculation. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, referencing relevant case law and Tribunal decisions. The fourth ground of appeal was rejected.

5. Deletion of Addition of Rs. 38,750 out of Fees Paid to Consultants:
The fifth issue involves the deletion of Rs. 38,750 from fees paid to consultants. The CIT(A) found that only Rs. 5,250 was covered by s. 80VV, with the remaining Rs. 16,750 allowable under s. 37. The Tribunal agreed with the CIT(A), confirming the decision and rejecting the fifth ground of appeal.

6. Deletion of Addition of Rs. 44,438 on Account of Office Expenses:
The sixth issue pertains to the deletion of Rs. 44,438 on account of office expenses. The CIT(A) treated these expenses as revenue expenditures, noting that no new asset had come into existence. The Tribunal agreed, referencing the Supreme Court decision in Empire Jute Co. Ltd. vs. CIT. The sixth ground of appeal was rejected.

7. Deletion of Addition of Rs. 1,87,000 on Account of Valuation of Stock:
The seventh issue concerns the deletion of Rs. 1,87,000 related to stock valuation. The CIT(A) accepted the assessee's explanation and adjustments for obsolete stock. The Tribunal found no reason to question the CIT(A)'s findings and confirmed the deletion. The seventh ground of appeal was rejected.

8. Allowance of Bad Debt Claim of Rs. 63,859:
The eighth issue involves the allowance of a bad debt claim of Rs. 63,859. The CIT(A) accepted the assessee's claim, referencing the Bombay High Court decision in Jethadhai Hirji and Jethabhai Ramdas vs. CIT. The Tribunal agreed with the CIT(A)'s application of the legal principles and confirmed the decision. The eighth ground of appeal was rejected.

9. Allowance of Reduction of Rs. 2,37,432 on Account of Extra Shift Allowance:
The ninth issue pertains to the allowance of a reduction of Rs. 2,37,432 for extra shift allowance. The CIT(A) directed the IAC to follow the Board's circular. The Tribunal found no reason to interfere with the CIT(A)'s decision, considering the Board's circular. The ninth ground of appeal was dismissed.

10. Allowance of Depreciation on Moulds at the Rate of 40%:
The tenth issue involves the allowance of depreciation on moulds at 40%. The CIT(A) justified this rate as the moulds were used in the plastic goods factory. The Tribunal confirmed the CIT(A)'s findings, rejecting the tenth ground of appeal.

11. Cross-Objections by the Assessee:
The assessee's cross-objections were rejected as the Tribunal confirmed the CIT(A)'s decisions on the related grounds. These included issues on deduction under s. 32(1)(iii), valuation of closing stock, office expenses, and extra shift depreciation on roads in factory premises.

Conclusion:
Both the departmental appeal and the assessee's cross-objections were dismissed, with the Tribunal upholding the CIT(A)'s decisions on all grounds.

← Previous Next →