9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
Interpretation of exemption under section 5(1)(xxxiii) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957 for a person of Indian origin returning to India permanently. Detailed Analysis: The case involved four appeals related to the assessment year 1978-79 filed by the revenue concerning four different assesses but dealing with an identical issue. The appeals were consolidated for convenience. The assesses, Indian citizens permanently settled in Kenya, migrated to India in 1970. The Wealth Tax Officer (WTO) held that the exemption under section 5(1)(xxxiii) applied for seven years starting from the assessment year following the return to India. The Appellate Authority Commissioner (AAC) allowed the exemption from the year the assesses became residents. The revenue contended that the exemption period was clear and should not be extended based on the assesses' non-resident status in 1971-72. The revenue argued that the exemption under section 5(1)(xxxiii) was limited to seven successive assessment years following the return to India. They emphasized that the statute's language was clear and unambiguous, and no additional considerations should extend the exemption period beyond what was intended by the Legislature. On the other hand, the assesses' counsel asserted that the assesses were non-residents in 1971-72 and thus not liable for wealth tax, supporting their entitlement to the exemption under section 5(1)(xxxiii) for the full seven-year period. The tribunal examined the submissions and referred to the Supreme Court's directive to interpret taxing statutes based on clear expressions rather than subjective notions. The tribunal highlighted the provision of section 5(1)(xxxiii), emphasizing that the exemption applied for seven successive assessment years from the year of return to India. The tribunal concluded that the assesses were entitled to the exemption for the period 1971-72 to 1977-78, regardless of their tax liability in each year. The tribunal disagreed with the AAC's decision to extend the exemption to the assessment year 1978-79 and upheld the WTO's orders. In conclusion, the tribunal allowed the revenue's appeals, overturning the AAC's decision and reinstating the WTO's orders. The judgment clarified the interpretation of the exemption under section 5(1)(xxxiii) for individuals of Indian origin returning to India permanently, emphasizing the statutory provisions' clear and unambiguous nature in determining the exemption period.
|
