9911796707
|
Home
Issues Involved:
1. Levy of penalty under section 272A(2)(c) of the Income-tax Act. 2. Scope of section 272A(2)(c) read with section 206 of the Income-tax Act. 3. Existence of reasonable cause for the delay in filing the return as per section 272A(2)(c). Issue-wise Detailed Analysis: 1. Levy of Penalty under Section 272A(2)(c): The assessee filed its return under section 206 of the Income-tax Act late by 747 days for the financial year ending on 31-3-1998 and by 381 days for the assessment year 1998-99. The Assessing Officer issued a show-cause notice for the levy of penalty under section 272A(2)(c) due to this delay. The assessee contended that the delay was due to financial constraints preventing the timely payment of taxes. The Assessing Officer noted similar defaults in previous and subsequent years and levied a penalty at the minimum rate of Rs. 100 per day. 2. Scope of Section 272A(2)(c) Read with Section 206: The assessee argued that the penalty levied was beyond the scope of section 272A(2)(c) read with section 206, as section 206 mandates filing the TDS return within the prescribed limit after the end of the financial year, while rule 37A requires filing within 14 days of the tax deduction date. The Tribunal scrutinized section 206 and rules 37 and 37A, concluding that section 206 pertains to annual TDS returns prescribed under rule 37, not quarterly returns under rule 37A. Rule 37A, applicable to non-residents, does not reference section 206 and requires quarterly returns within 14 days from the end of the quarter. Consequently, failure to file quarterly returns under rule 37A does not attract a penalty under section 272A(2)(c). 3. Existence of Reasonable Cause for the Delay: The assessee provided substantial evidence of financial constraints preventing timely tax deposit and return filing. The Tribunal reviewed the evidence and relevant judgments, concluding that financial constraints constituted a reasonable cause for the delay. The Tribunal cited previous judgments supporting the view that penalizing an assessee without funds to pay taxes is unjustified. The Tribunal found no rebuttal evidence from the revenue against the assessee's financial constraints and ruled that the assessee had a reasonable cause for the delay, thus setting aside the CIT(A)'s order and deleting the penalty. Conclusion: The Tribunal concluded that the penalty under section 272A(2)(c) was not applicable for delays in filing quarterly returns under rule 37A, as these returns are not prescribed under section 206. Additionally, the Tribunal recognized the assessee's financial constraints as a reasonable cause for the delay, leading to the deletion of the penalty. Consequently, the appeals of the assessee were allowed.
|
