9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
Confirmation of Assessing Officer's order under section 154 of the Income-tax Act regarding withdrawal of rebate claimed under section 88 in respect of interest credited to the PPF A/c. Analysis: The appeal filed by the assessee challenges the order of the CIT(A) confirming the Assessing Officer's order under section 154 of the IT Act, withdrawing the rebate claimed under section 88 in relation to interest credited to the PPF A/c. The Assessing Officer initially accepted the return of income under section 143(1) based on the returned total income. Subsequently, noticing the claimed rebate under section 88, the Assessing Officer proposed to withdraw it, leading to the impugned order under section 154. The main contention raised by the assessee's counsel was that the Assessing Officer lacked the power to withdraw the rebate under section 88 while processing the return under section 143(1) due to the amendments brought in by the Finance Act, 1999. The counsel argued that the Assessing Officer's authority to make variations in the returned income was withdrawn under the new provisions, and therefore, the order under section 154 was beyond scope. Additionally, it was contended that the issue of rebate under section 88 in relation to interest credited to the PPF A/c was debatable, suggesting that the action taken by the Assessing Officer was not justified. The Departmental Representative (D.R.) argued that as per section 88, no rebate was admissible concerning interest credited to the PPF A/c, and since the rebate was wrongly allowed, the Assessing Officer had the jurisdiction to rectify the mistake under section 154. The Tribunal analyzed the legal issues involved, focusing on the amendments to sections 143(1) and 154 introduced by the Finance Act, 1999. It noted that under the new provisions, the Assessing Officer's power to make adjustments/variations in the returned income was withdrawn, emphasizing that under section 143(1), the Assessing Officer was required to accept the income returned by the assessee without making any disallowances or variations. The Tribunal agreed with the assessee's counsel that if the Assessing Officer lacked the power to do something while passing an order, invoking section 154 could not grant such authority. Referring to a previous ITAT decision, the Tribunal held that the Assessing Officer could not assume powers under section 154 that were not available to him while issuing an intimation under section 143(1). The Tribunal delved into the purpose of the amendments, highlighting the intent to simplify processing of returns and eliminate prima facie adjustments, emphasizing that the Assessing Officer's powers under section 154 were limited to rectifying tax or interest calculations. Based on this analysis, the Tribunal concluded that the Assessing Officer had no authority to withdraw the rebate claimed under section 88 by invoking section 154. Consequently, the impugned order under section 154 was canceled, and the appeal was allowed in favor of the assessee. The remaining grounds related to the withdrawal of interest paid under section 244A were deemed consequential, and the Assessing Officer was directed to allow correct interest as per the provisions of the Income-tax Act.
|
