Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + AT Income Tax - 1986 (6) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

1986 (6) TMI 69 - AT - Income Tax

Issues:
1. Validity of reassessment under section 147 of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
2. Application of sections 149, 150(1), and 151(2) in the reassessment process.
3. Interpretation of Tribunal's direction in their order dated 3-9-1982 regarding film expenses deduction.
4. Necessity of prior permission for reassessment under section 150(1).

Analysis:
1. The case involved the validity of reassessment under section 147 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, for the assessment years 1972-73 and 1973-74. The Income Tax Officer (ITO) withdrew previously allowed deductions related to film expenses, leading to an appeal by the assessee.

2. The Commissioner (Appeals) upheld the reassessment orders, citing the applicability of section 150(1) which empowers the ITO to issue notices for reassessment based on findings or directions from appellate authorities. The Commissioner held that the reassessment orders were in accordance with the Tribunal's direction in their order dated 3-9-1982, thus exempting them from the limitations under section 149 and the necessity for prior permission under section 151(2).

3. The Tribunal's direction in their order dated 3-9-1982 was crucial in determining the validity of the reassessment. The Tribunal had directed the ITO to amortize film costs based on specific guidelines provided in Circular No. 30 dated 4-10-1969. The Tribunal's order led to the withdrawal of previously allowed expenses in subsequent years, as the entire cost of films was now allowed in the years of release itself.

4. The assessee contended that the reassessment orders were invalid due to the absence of prior permission under section 151(2) and the lack of a specific direction from the Tribunal in their earlier order. However, the department argued that the Tribunal's direction to allow full film costs in the release years constituted a valid direction within the scope of section 150(1).

In conclusion, the Appellate Tribunal upheld the reassessment orders, stating that the Tribunal's direction in the 1982 order was sufficient to validate the reassessment under section 147. The Tribunal's directive to allow full film costs in the release years led to the withdrawal of expenses in subsequent years, aligning with the legal provisions under sections 149, 150(1), and 151(2). The appeals filed by the assessee were dismissed, affirming the validity of the reassessment by the revenue authorities.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates