9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
1. Deletion of addition of Rs. 17,000 in the trading account. 2. Deletion of addition of Rs. 40,000 under section 68 of the Income Tax Act. 3. Deletion of addition of Rs. 5,215 made on account of interest. Analysis: Issue 1: Deletion of addition of Rs. 17,000 in the trading account - The Revenue appealed against the deletion of an addition of Rs. 17,000 in the trading account for the assessment year 1988-89. - The Assessing Officer (AO) made the addition due to a difference in the value of stock of timber and a low Gross Profit (G.P.) rate. - The assessee argued that the G.P. rate was reasonable based on past years' assessments and no specific defects were found in the assessment. - The first appellate authority accepted the assessee's plea and deleted the addition. - The Tribunal agreed with the assessee, considering the past history of the case and the practical difficulties in maintaining a day-to-day stock register for a timber business. - The Tribunal found no justification to sustain the addition, ruling in favor of the assessee. Issue 2: Deletion of addition of Rs. 40,000 under section 68 of the Income Tax Act - The AO added Rs. 40,000 as a cash credit entry under section 68 due to an unserved notice to the creditor, Shri Ram Rice Mills. - The common partner confirmed the deposit and provided relevant documents, but the AO did not accept the explanation. - The assessee contended that the creditor firm had closed, and the deposit was genuine, supported by bank transactions and the partner's confirmation. - The Tribunal agreed with the assessee, noting the evidence provided, including bank records showing the deposit and withdrawal, establishing the genuineness of the transaction. - The Tribunal ruled that the identity of the depositor was not in doubt and upheld the deletion of the addition under section 68. Issue 3: Deletion of addition of Rs. 5,215 made on account of interest - The AO disallowed Rs. 5,215 claimed as interest payment, stating it related to earlier years. - The assessee argued that the bank debited the interest during the current assessment year, justifying the claim in the year under appeal. - The Tribunal agreed with the assessee, emphasizing that the expenditure arose in the current year when the bank charged the interest. - The Tribunal found no reason to disallow the deduction, as the bank debited the account during the relevant assessment year, supporting the assessee's claim. - Consequently, the Tribunal dismissed the appeal, upholding the deletion of the addition made on account of interest.
|
