9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
Assessment of individuals vs. Hindu Undivided Family (HUF) status under the Kerala Joint Hindu Family System (Abolition) Act, 1975. Analysis: The judgment by the Appellate Tribunal ITAT COCHIN dealt with IT Appeal No. 62 and IT Appeal No. 94 concerning assessments on Shri P.G. Narayanaswamy for the assessment year 1979-80, with IT Appeal No. 62 being the assessee's appeal and IT Appeal No. 94 being the department's appeal. Additionally, IT Appeal No. 95 involved an appeal by the revenue regarding the assessment on Shri P.G. Subramaniam for the same assessment year. Both Narayanaswamy and Subramaniam are partners in a firm and were previously assessed as individuals. However, they claimed HUF status after getting married, citing the creation of a joint Hindu family. The Income Tax Officer (ITO) rejected this claim, assessing them as individuals based on the Kerala Act. The Appellate Authority confirmed the individual assessments, leading to appeals by the department and Narayanaswamy. The department's appeals contended that the ITO did not pass an order under section 171(3) of the Income-tax Act, which was necessary for assessing HUF status. However, the Tribunal found that the appeals were misconceived as the assessees were consistently assessed as individuals, and the ITO's decision was based on the marriage-related claim. The Tribunal upheld the Appellate Authority's decision to entertain the appeals on HUF status. Subramaniam did not appeal his individual assessment. Narayanaswamy's appeal focused on challenging the finding that no HUF was formed due to the Kerala Act. The Tribunal analyzed the impact of the Kerala Act on the formation of an HUF post-marriage. Despite arguments that the Act did not prevent the creation of an HUF through marriage, the Tribunal disagreed. It emphasized the Act's purpose to abolish the joint family system entirely, including rights by birth and joint tenancy. The Tribunal cited a Kerala High Court judgment affirming the Act's abolition of all joint Hindu families in Kerala. Consequently, the Tribunal upheld the individual assessment for Narayanaswamy, rejecting the claim for HUF status post-marriage. In conclusion, the Tribunal dismissed all three appeals, affirming the individual assessments for Narayanaswamy and Subramaniam based on the Kerala Act's abolition of joint Hindu families and the inapplicability of HUF status post-marriage under the Act.
|
