1985 (9) TMI 127 - AT - Income Tax

Issues Involved:

1. Whether there was a deemed gift under section 4 of the Gift-tax Act, 1958.
2. Proper valuation of the alleged gift.
3. Legal implications of transferring property to a partnership firm without a registered document.
4. Whether the gift was exempt under section 5(1)(xiv) of the Gift-tax Act.
5. Validity of subsequent gifts made by the assessee in the assessment year 1978-79.

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Deemed Gift under Section 4 of the Gift-tax Act:

The primary issue was whether the transfer of the coffee and cardamom plantation estate by the assessee to the partnership firm constituted a deemed gift under section 4 of the Gift-tax Act, 1958. The assessee formed a partnership with his wife and children, contributing his estate as capital valued at Rs. 2,50,000, while the market value was Rs. 5,26,650. The GTO considered the difference as a deemed gift. The Tribunal upheld the GTO's view, stating that the excess value of Rs. 2,76,650 represented a gift, as there was an extinguishment of the assessee's rights in favor of the other partners.

2. Valuation of the Alleged Gift:

The Tribunal found merit in the contention that the gift was not properly valued. The GTO had incorrectly taken the total value of the estate at Rs. 8,26,300, which was the total wealth of the assessee, including movable and immovable properties. The correct value of the coffee and cardamom plantation and the bungalow was Rs. 5,26,650. After deducting the capital contribution of Rs. 2,50,000 and exemptions, the Tribunal determined the taxable gift at Rs. 2,44,677.

3. Transfer of Property to Partnership Firm Without Registered Document:

The assessee argued that no transfer occurred as there was no registered document. The Tribunal rejected this argument, citing decisions from the Allahabad High Court and Rajasthan High Court, which held that a partner could bring immovable property into the firm's assets without a registered document. The Tribunal concluded that the entire property became the firm's property under section 14 of the Indian Partnership Act.

4. Exemption under Section 5(1)(xiv) of the Gift-tax Act:

The assessee claimed that the gift was exempt under section 5(1)(xiv), arguing it was made in the course of carrying on business. The Tribunal dismissed this claim, noting that the partnership was newly formed, and the other partners had no prior experience in the business. The Tribunal followed the Supreme Court's decision in P. Gheevarghese, Travancore Timbers & Products, which required an integral connection between the gift and the business. The Tribunal found no such connection and held that the exemption did not apply.

5. Subsequent Gifts in the Assessment Year 1978-79:

For the assessment year 1978-79, the assessee executed gift deeds for 89.54 acres of the plantation to his daughters. The Commissioner (Appeals) held that since the estate was already subjected to gift-tax in 1974-75, the subsequent gifts had no legal effect. The Tribunal agreed, stating that the assessee had already lost title to the property and could not gift it again. Consequently, the appeal for 1978-79 was dismissed.

Conclusion:

The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal for the assessment year 1974-75, determining the taxable gift at Rs. 2,44,677, and dismissed the appeal for the assessment year 1978-79, upholding the Commissioner's decision that the subsequent gifts had no legal effect.

← Previous Next →