Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + AT Income Tax - 2001 (11) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2001 (11) TMI 225 - AT - Income Tax

Issues Involved:
1. Eligibility for deduction u/s 80-O for services rendered.
2. Nature of services rendered by the assessee.
3. Interpretation of "services rendered from India" vs. "services rendered in India".

Summary:

1. Eligibility for Deduction u/s 80-O:
The primary issue was whether the assessee was eligible for a deduction u/s 80-O for the assessment year 1993-94. The revenue contended that the assessee did not fulfill the conditions for claiming the deduction as the services were rendered in India and not from India. The Commissioner (Appeals) directed the Assessing Officer to allow the deduction, which was challenged by the revenue.

2. Nature of Services Rendered by the Assessee:
The assessee, engaged in providing commercial services to foreign enterprises, claimed a deduction u/s 80-O for services such as locating reliable sources of frozen sea-foods, liaising with agencies for bacteriological analysis, providing market analysis, advising foreign enterprises on manufacturing trends, and negotiating prices. The Assessing Officer held that these services were rendered in India, acting as an agent for foreign enterprises, and thus did not qualify for the deduction u/s 80-O.

3. Interpretation of "Services Rendered from India" vs. "Services Rendered in India":
The assessee argued that the services were rendered from India and utilized by foreign enterprises outside India, which should qualify for the deduction. The Commissioner (Appeals) agreed, stating that the assessee provided specialized and technical services from India that were used by foreign enterprises to make import decisions. The Tribunal upheld this view, distinguishing between services rendered in India (e.g., quality control, shipping) and services rendered from India (e.g., market analysis, technical advice).

Conclusion:
The Tribunal dismissed the revenue's appeal, affirming that the assessee's services were indeed rendered from India and qualified for the deduction u/s 80-O. The Tribunal emphasized a liberal interpretation of incentive provisions like section 80-O to promote foreign exchange earnings through services rendered by Indian residents.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates