Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Wealth-tax Wealth-tax + AT Wealth-tax - 1983 (2) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

1983 (2) TMI 98 - AT - Wealth-tax

Issues:
1. Interpretation of section 16(5) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957
2. Application of section 22M(2) of the Act for withdrawal of appeals
3. Effect of High Court judgment on withdrawal of appeals

Analysis:

1. Interpretation of section 16(5) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957:
The case involved a question regarding the interpretation of section 16(5) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957, related to the entitlement of the assessee to a second opportunity for assessment. The High Court, in a previous judgment, answered this question in the negative, emphasizing that the Tribunal should have assessed whether the estimates made by the wealth-tax authorities were supported by the evidence on record. This led to a subsequent hearing to review the propriety and fairness of the estimates.

2. Application of section 22M(2) of the Act for withdrawal of appeals:
During the proceedings, the assessee sought permission to withdraw all appeals for the assessment years 1962-63 to 1969-70 under section 22M(2) to approach the Settlement Commission. The counsel for the assessee cited legal precedents to support the application, highlighting the Tribunal's powers to reconsider appeals after a reference to the High Court. However, the departmental representative opposed the withdrawal, arguing against allowing it at that stage.

3. Effect of High Court judgment on withdrawal of appeals:
The Tribunal, after considering the submissions, declined the assessee's request to withdraw the appeals under section 22M(2) at that stage. The Tribunal reasoned that permitting withdrawal at that point would render both the Tribunal's order and the High Court's judgment ineffective. The Tribunal emphasized its duty to dispose of the case in line with the High Court's judgment, indicating a commitment to assess the propriety and fairness of the estimates based on the High Court's directives.

This detailed analysis covers the key issues addressed in the legal judgment, focusing on the interpretation of relevant statutory provisions, the application of legal principles, and the impact of prior court decisions on the current proceedings.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates