9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
Penalty under section 273(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for filing a wrong estimate of advance tax. Detailed Analysis: The appellant objected to the penalty of Rs. 12,650 imposed by the AAC under section 273(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The appellant was required to pay advance tax of Rs. 4,74,348 for the assessment year 1967-68 based on the last completed assessment. Initially, the appellant estimated his total income at Rs. 2,28,228 and paid advance tax of Rs. 1,22,505. However, upon filing the return of income, the appellant declared an income of Rs. 3,66,386, leading to a total income assessed by the ITO at Rs. 12,02,820. The ITO initiated penalty proceedings for filing a wrong estimate under section 212 of the Act, leading to the imposition of a penalty of Rs. 40,000 by the ITO, which was later reduced to Rs. 12,650 by the AAC. The appellant submitted objections against the penalty, which were rejected by the ITO. The AAC upheld the penalty but reduced the amount to Rs. 12,650. Dissatisfied with this decision, the appellant appealed to the Tribunal. The Tribunal considered the submissions of both parties and reviewed the appellant's estimate of advance tax, which was based on a partial partition in the appellant's family. The Tribunal noted that while the ITO had rejected the appellant's claim in earlier assessments, subsequent decisions by the Tribunal and the Allahabad High Court supported the exclusion of certain income from the appellant's total income. The Tribunal concluded that the appellant did not file an estimate of advance tax that he knew or had reason to believe to be untrue under section 273(a) of the Act. Citing precedents, the Tribunal emphasized that a variation between the estimated income for advance tax purposes and the actual returned income does not automatically warrant a penalty. Therefore, the Tribunal found no justification for the penalty imposed and canceled the penalty of Rs. 12,650, directing a refund to the appellant if already paid. In the final decision, the Tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning the penalty imposed under section 273(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
|
