Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + AT Income Tax - 1984 (8) TMI AT This
Issues:
1. Deduction under section 80P(2)(a)(iii) allowed on gross profit or processed income. 2. Interpretation of the words 'the whole of the amount of profits and gains of business' in section 80P(2). 3. Whether profits and gains for section 80P should be considered in a commercial sense or as per Act provisions. 4. Applicability of section 80AB for computing deductions under sections 80HH to 80TT. Detailed Analysis: 1. The appeal concerned the deduction under section 80P(2)(a)(iii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The dispute revolved around whether the deduction should be allowed on gross profit or processed income. The assessee contended that the deduction should be on the whole of gross profit attributable to marketing agricultural produce of its members. The Commissioner (Appeals) rejected this plea, relying on the decision in Cambay Electric Supply Industrial Co. Ltd. v. CIT [1978] 113 ITR 84. The Tribunal had to determine the correct interpretation of the provision. 2. The Tribunal analyzed the meaning of 'the whole of the amount of profits and gains of business' in section 80P(2). It was noted that the Act did not provide a specific definition for these terms. The Tribunal emphasized that profits and gains of a business typically refer to net profit, not gross profit. It was highlighted that profits and gains are the surplus after deducting legitimate business expenses necessary for earning such profits. The Tribunal further explained that profits and gains of a trade or business should be understood in a commercial sense, as ascertained on ordinary principles of commercial trading. 3. The Tribunal delved into whether profits and gains for section 80P should be considered in a commercial sense or as per the provisions of the Act. It was concluded that gross profit alone could not be considered as profits and gains of a business, as it could lead to anomalous situations where there might be a gross profit but an overall loss due to necessary business expenses. The Tribunal disagreed with the assessee's argument that profits and gains should be taken as gross profit. Instead, it held that for ascertaining the profits and gains attributable to the marketing of agricultural produce, all business expenses should be considered, including normal depreciation. 4. The Tribunal also addressed the applicability of section 80AB for computing deductions under sections 80HH to 80TT. It was clarified that while this provision came into force from 1-4-1981, it did not extend to earlier years. Therefore, for the year under consideration, the Tribunal emphasized that gross profit alone should not be considered as profits and gains of business for the purpose of claiming deductions under section 80P. The Tribunal directed the assessing officer to deduct the profits and gains based on the principles laid down in the judgment. This detailed analysis of the judgment provides a comprehensive understanding of the issues involved and the Tribunal's reasoning in interpreting the relevant provisions of the Income-tax Act.
|