Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + AT Income Tax - 1989 (12) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

1989 (12) TMI 93 - AT - Income Tax

Issues:
Disallowance under section 37(3A) and section 37(3B) for assessment years 1984-85 and 1985-86.

Analysis:
The judgment involves two appeals filed by the department concerning disallowance under section 37(3A) and section 37(3B) for the assessment years 1984-85 and 1985-86. The assessee, a private limited company engaged in chit fund and finance business, paid agent's commission which the Income-tax Officer disallowed as expenditure on "Sales promotion" under section 37(3B)(i). The Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) held that the payments to agents did not constitute sales promotion expenditure as envisaged under section 37(3A) and section 37(3B) since the commissions were related to sales already made, not for future sales promotion. The department argued that the disallowance was justified based on the wording of the sections, claiming the commission was for sales promotion. However, the assessee contended that the commission was a reward for securing subscribers and ensuring payments, not for sales promotion. The Tribunal considered the nature of the commission, emphasizing it was essential for the business and paid for specific services rendered, not for general sales promotion. The Tribunal agreed with the Commissioner's view and upheld the decision, dismissing the appeals.

In the judgment, it was highlighted that section 37 deals with expenditures for business purposes, and sub-sections (3A) & (3B) were inserted to control extravagant expenses on advertisement, publicity, and sales promotion. The Board's Circular clarified that "sales promotion" encompasses various activities, but the term was not defined in the Act. The Tribunal analyzed that the commission paid by the assessee was integral to its profit-earning process, not for general sales promotion. The commission was a reward for specific services related to securing subscribers and ensuring payments, essential for the business operations. The Tribunal concluded that the commission payment did not fall under sales promotion as intended by sub-sections (3A) and (3B), aligning with a previous decision and upholding the Commissioner's order. The appeals were dismissed based on this analysis.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates