1995 (10) TMI 74 - AT - Income Tax

Assessing Officer, Assessment Year, Charitable And Religious Purposes, Charitable Purpose, Expenditure Incurred, Religious Trust

Issues Involved:
1. Whether the assessee-trust spent 75% of its income towards religious or charitable purposes.
2. Whether the assessee-trust is entitled to exemption under section 11(1)(a) of the Income-tax Act.
3. Validity of the income and expenditure statement and the balance sheet filed by the assessee-trust.
4. Legitimacy of the search and seizure operations and the implications of the seized materials.
5. Examination of the aims and objects of the trust as per the trust deed.
6. Consistency in the treatment of the assessee-trust's status over the years.
7. Calculation of the trust's income based on commercial principles.
8. Whether the assessee-trust was engaged in non-charitable and non-genuine activities.

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Whether the assessee-trust spent 75% of its income towards religious or charitable purposes:
The assessee-trust filed its return declaring an income of Rs. 2,170, claiming that it had spent 75% of its income towards religious or charitable purposes. The Assessing Officer (AO) completed the assessment on a total income of Rs. 2,12,516, considering voluntary donations and interest income, and denied the exemption under section 11 of the Income-tax Act, treating the trust as an Association of Persons (AOP).

2. Whether the assessee-trust is entitled to exemption under section 11(1)(a) of the Income-tax Act:
The main question was whether the trust's income was applied for religious or charitable purposes. The AO denied the exemption, stating that the trust was not engaged in any charitable activities during the relevant period. However, the Tribunal examined the trust deed and found that the trust was established for religious and charitable purposes, and its income was applied accordingly.

3. Validity of the income and expenditure statement and the balance sheet filed by the assessee-trust:
The AO and CIT (Appeals) questioned the validity of the income and expenditure statement and the balance sheet filed by the trust. The Tribunal noted that the trust had filed an auditor's report along with the return and that the income and expenditure statement showed various expenses related to the trust's activities. The Tribunal found no substantial evidence to falsify the claim of the expenditure incurred by the trust.

4. Legitimacy of the search and seizure operations and the implications of the seized materials:
A raid and search were conducted at the trust's premises, and certain materials were seized. The AO relied on the seized materials and the statement of Shri Vallabh Vyas to deny the exemption. However, the Tribunal observed that the seized materials did not pertain to the relevant assessment year and that the statement of Shri Vallabh Vyas did not contain any adverse material against the trust.

5. Examination of the aims and objects of the trust as per the trust deed:
The Tribunal examined the trust deed, which was dated 30-6-1980, and found that the trust was established for religious and charitable purposes. The aims and objects included promoting Indian culture, scientific research in Ayurvedic medicine, supporting educational institutions, and providing aid to the poor. The Tribunal concluded that the trust was a public religious and charitable trust.

6. Consistency in the treatment of the assessee-trust's status over the years:
The Tribunal noted that the trust had been consistently recognized as a public charitable trust in earlier years and had been granted exemption under section 11. The Tribunal emphasized the need for consistency in the recognition of trusts and cited relevant case laws to support its view.

7. Calculation of the trust's income based on commercial principles:
The Tribunal held that the income of the trust should be computed by applying commercial principles, excluding all outgoings and expenses. The Tribunal relied on various case laws to support this view and concluded that the trust's income should be determined at Rs. 2,170, as shown in the income and expenditure statement.

8. Whether the assessee-trust was engaged in non-charitable and non-genuine activities:
The AO and CIT (Appeals) alleged that the trust was engaged in non-charitable and non-genuine activities based on the seized materials and the statement of Shri Vallabh Vyas. However, the Tribunal found no substantial evidence to support these allegations and held that the trust was engaged in charitable and religious activities as per its aims and objects.

Conclusion:
The Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the assessee-trust, set aside the order of the CIT (Appeals), and held that the trust was entitled to exemption under section 11(1)(a) of the Income-tax Act. The Tribunal determined the trust's income at Rs. 2,170 and recognized it as a public religious and charitable trust.

← Previous Next →