Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + AT Income Tax - 2008 (6) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2008 (6) TMI 235 - AT - Income Tax

Issues:
- Maintainability of revenue's appeal for assessment year 1999-2000
- Decision on merit for assessment years 2000-01 and 2001-02

Analysis:
1. Maintainability of Revenue's Appeal for 1999-2000:
- The revenue's appeal for the assessment year 1999-2000 was challenged on the grounds that the tax effect was below the limit prescribed by the CBDT Instruction No. 2 of 2005. The Tribunal agreed with the assessee that the appeal was not maintainable due to the tax effect being below the prescribed limit of Rs. 2 lakhs. The Tribunal cited previous judgments and held that cumulative tax effect should not be considered, and each case should individually satisfy the monetary limits. As there was no pleading in the memorandum of appeal that the appeal fell within exceptions, the appeal was dismissed in limine.

2. Decision on Merit for 2000-01 and 2001-02:
- For the assessment years 2000-01 and 2001-02, the matter was directed to be restored back to the file of the CIT(A) for a decision on merit. This decision was based on the fact that the CIT(A) had decided in favor of the assessee citing a legal ground that satisfaction regarding concealment was not recorded by the Assessing Officer before initiating penalty proceedings. The Tribunal noted that the Act was amended with retrospective effect, and hence, the issue of penalty needed to be reconsidered on merit. Therefore, the orders of the CIT(A) for these two years were set aside, and the matters were restored back to the CIT(A) for fresh decisions on merit.

3. Final Outcome:
- The appeal of the revenue for the assessment year 1999-2000 was dismissed, while the appeals for the assessment years 2000-01 and 2001-02 were allowed for statistical purposes. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of complying with the prescribed limits for filing appeals and the need for decisions on merit based on updated legal provisions.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates