Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + AT Income Tax - 1982 (10) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

1982 (10) TMI 87 - AT - Income Tax

Issues:
1. Valuation of asset for wealth tax assessment.
2. Challenge to the Tribunal's judgment.
3. Constitution of a Three Member Bench.

Valuation of asset for wealth tax assessment:
The case involved an appeal by the revenue against the order of the AAC concerning the valuation of an individual's share in a property for the assessment year 1974-75. The WTO had determined the net wealth, including the share in the property, at Rs. 1,24,000, while the assessee declared it at Rs. 67,466 based on a registered valuer's report. The WTO valued the share at Rs. 1 lakh using a different method than the registered valuer. The AAC directed a re-estimation based on the Wealth-tax Rules, as per a Tribunal case precedent.

Challenge to the Tribunal's judgment:
The revenue contested the Tribunal's judgment in a previous case, arguing that it was not binding as some legal questions were referred to the High Court. However, the Tribunal held that the pendency of legal questions did not invalidate the previous judgment. The revenue also challenged the constitution of a Three Member Bench in the previous case, claiming it was invalid. The Tribunal found that the Bench was properly constituted by the President of the Tribunal under relevant provisions of the Income-tax Act and Wealth-tax Act, rejecting the revenue's arguments based on the interpretation of statutory provisions.

Constitution of a Three Member Bench:
The Tribunal analyzed the relevant provisions of the Income-tax Act and Wealth-tax Act to determine the validity of constituting a Three Member Bench. It concluded that the President of the Tribunal had the authority to constitute such a Bench under the applicable laws. The Tribunal disagreed with the revenue's interpretation of the provisions and cited a previous case to support its reasoning. Ultimately, the appeal by the revenue was dismissed, upholding the Tribunal's decision regarding the valuation of the asset and the constitution of the Three Member Bench.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates