Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + AT Income Tax - 1986 (2) TMI AT This
Issues:
1. Whether the assessee, a registered society, qualifies for income tax exemption under sections 11 and 12 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. 2. Whether the amounts received by the assessee through advertisements in its souvenir can be considered as voluntary donations or are taxable as income from trading activity. Detailed Analysis: 1. The assessee, a registered society, claimed income tax exemption under sections 11 and 12 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, contending it is a charitable institution. The Income Tax Officer (ITO) rejected the claim, stating that the society's benefits are limited to its members who are employees of a specific organization. The society's objectives included sports, recreation, cultural activities, financial aid to members, and scholarships. The ITO deemed these objectives as not charitable, as they primarily benefitted private individuals or a fluctuating body of private individuals. The Commissioner (Appeals) upheld the ITO's decision, emphasizing that the society did not serve charitable purposes. The society argued that its objects were charitable, and the income should be exempt. However, the tribunal, citing a relevant case law, concluded that the society's benefits were limited to private individuals, and thus, it did not qualify as a charitable trust. 2. The second issue revolved around whether the amounts received by the assessee through advertisements in its souvenir could be considered voluntary donations or taxable as trading receipts. The society contended that the advertisement charges collected were voluntary donations for constructing its office building. Citing a Bombay High Court case, the tribunal held that contributions received through advertisements, even at prescribed rates, could be regarded as voluntary contributions. Therefore, the amounts received by the society through advertisements in its souvenir were deemed as voluntary donations and not taxable as trading receipts. Consequently, the tribunal partly allowed the appeals filed by the assessee.
|