9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
1. Whether the revised return filed by the assessee was under the Amnesty Scheme. 2. Dispute regarding the levy of interest under sections 139(8) and 215. Detailed Analysis: 1. The assessee, a registered firm, did not file the return of income as required under section 139(1) of the Income-tax Act. A return was filed on 27-8-1985, admitting an income of Rs. 1,66,413. Later, on 31-3-1986, a revised return was filed declaring an income of Rs. 2,86,413. The Income-tax Officer ignored the revised return as the original return was not filed under the specified sections. The Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) dismissed the plea of the assessee, stating that the revised return was not filed under the Amnesty Scheme. However, she deleted the disallowances made by the Income-tax Officer, resulting in the disclosed income aligning with the income determined post the appellate order. 2. The Income-tax Officer levied interest under sections 139(8) and 215, which the assessee objected to before the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals). The Commissioner dismissed the objection, stating that the levy of interest is not appealable. The assessee argued that the return filed on 31-3-1986 should be treated as under the Amnesty Scheme, as the original return was filed after the specified time. The department contended that the return was a revised return and not under the Amnesty Scheme, justifying the interest levied. 3. The Appellate Tribunal upheld the contention that the return filed on 31-3-1986 was under the Amnesty Scheme. The conduct of the assessee and its partners, filing returns admitting higher incomes and paying taxes during the Amnesty Scheme, indicated the intention of availing the scheme. The Tribunal referred to Circular No. 451 dated 17-2-1986, clarifying the applicability of the Amnesty Scheme to completed assessments and pending assessments. It was held that the return filed under the Amnesty Scheme should have been acted upon for assessment purposes. 4. The Tribunal rejected the argument that the assessee cannot seek remedy before the appellate authorities for issues related to the Amnesty Scheme. It emphasized that the assessment process must adhere to the provisions of the Income-tax Act, allowing the assessee to object to the nature and quantum of assessment. The liability for interest under the Amnesty Scheme was on the assessee, and the Tribunal directed the assessee to approach the Income-tax Officer for waiver of interest, as per the scheme guidelines. 5. In conclusion, the appeal was partly allowed, recognizing the return filed on 31-3-1986 as valid under the Amnesty Scheme and directing the assessee to seek waiver of interest from the Income-tax Officer as per the scheme guidelines.
|
