9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
1. Disallowance of diet expenses claimed by the assessee. 2. Whether the expenses incurred by the assessee were in the nature of entertainment expenses. Analysis: 1. The assessee, a registered firm deriving income from the sale of cloth, filed returns declaring varying incomes. The Income Tax Officer (ITO) disallowed diet expenses of Rs. 7,480 claimed by the assessee, citing them as entertainment expenses under section 37(2A) of the IT Act, 1961. The ITO also deemed these expenses as including personal expenses of partners on tour and completed the assessment at Rs. 30,740, making an addition of Rs. 3,925 based on higher gross profit rates applied to sales figures. 2. The assessee appealed to the Appellate Authority Commissioner (AAC), arguing that only part of the expenses were previously considered inadmissible and thus the full disallowance was unjustified. The AAC, however, upheld the disallowance, stating that expenses on tea and meals for customers and partners on tour were entertainment expenses, relying on legal precedents. The Tribunal, on further appeal, agreed with the AAC's findings, supporting the view that the expenses were indeed in the nature of entertainment. 3. Consequently, the Tribunal referred the question of whether the expenses in question were entertainment expenditures in law to the High Court for opinion. The Tribunal's decision was based on the premise that the expenses incurred by the assessee, related to providing tea and meals to visitors and partners, were not wholly and exclusively for business purposes, thus falling under the category of entertainment expenses. The final statement of the case was prepared after no suggestions were received from the involved parties regarding the draft statement circulated.
|
