9911796707
|
Home
Issues involved: Cross-appeals by the assessee and the Department against the order of the learned CIT(A) for the assessment year 1986-87.
Departmental Appeal - Trading Addition: The Department raised two grounds challenging the reduction of trading addition from Rs. 1,12,497 to Rs. 20,000 based on low gross profit rate. The Assessing Officer invoked section 145 due to alleged irregularities, estimating total sales at Rs. 58,00,000 with a gross profit rate of 14.5%. The CIT(A) upheld the application of section 145 but restricted the addition to Rs. 20,000, deeming the Assessing Officer's action excessive. The Department contested this decision, arguing for the full addition to be sustained. The assessee's counsel argued against the invoking of section 145, asserting proper maintenance of records and challenging the reasons for the low gross profit rate. It was highlighted that historical practices were consistent, and previous assessments were based on book results. The Tribunal found the rejection of books unjustified and the application of section 145 erroneous. The Department's estimation of sales and gross profit rate lacked basis and evidence, leading to the direction to delete the trading addition of Rs. 1,12,497. Departmental Appeal - Repair and Maintenance Expenses: The Department's second ground concerned the deletion of Rs. 67,700 addition for repair and maintenance expenses, deemed of revenue nature by the CIT(A). The expenses were incurred to restore existing assets damaged by floods, with supporting evidence provided. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, stating that no new assets were created, and the expenses were necessary for asset restoration, thus allowable as revenue expenses. Assessee's Appeal - Travelling Expenses: The assessee's appeal addressed the disallowance of Rs. 4,000 for travelling expenses due to insufficient details in vouchers. The Tribunal rejected the appeal, as the purpose of visit is essential, and no evidence was presented to refute the Assessing Officer's findings on specific instances lacking necessary information. Assessee's Appeal - Disallowance under Section 43B: The final ground in the assessee's appeal involved the disallowance of Rs. 5,686 under section 43B for non-payment of statutory liability during the year. The counsel argued that the payment was made before the return filing due date, thus allowable under the section's proviso. The Tribunal directed the allowance of the amount after verification, aligning with previous decisions. In conclusion, the Department's appeal was dismissed, and the assessee's appeal was partly allowed, with specific additions and disallowances addressed and decided upon accordingly.
|
