9911796707
|
Home
Issues involved: Appeal by assessee against non-cancellation of penalty, appeal by Revenue against reduction of penalty, delay in furnishing return, leviability of penalty under section 272A(2)(c), applicability of time-limit for filing TDS return, interpretation of relevant legal provisions.
Analysis: The judgment by the Appellate Tribunal ITAT JODHPUR involved two appeals, one by the assessee and the other by the Revenue, both related to the assessment year 1989-90 and directed against the same order of CIT(A) Ajmer. The assessee contested the non-cancellation of penalty limited to the TDS liability, while the Revenue challenged the reduction of penalty to the TDS liability amount. Both appeals were heard together for convenience. The authorized representative of the assessee argued that no penalty should be imposed as there was only a delay in furnishing the return without any loss to the Revenue. It was contended that the time-limit for filing the TDS return was inserted later in the relevant section by an amendment, and the rule specifying the time-limit was beyond the rule-making authority's power. Various legal precedents were cited to support the argument. The Departmental Representative of Revenue supported the CIT(A)'s order on penalty levy and the AO's decision on the quantum of penalty. It was argued that the amendment regarding penalty not exceeding the TDS amount did not apply due to the assessment year being 1989-90. After considering the contentions, the Tribunal found the argument regarding the period prescribed for filing the TDS return inapplicable for the assessment year 1989-90. Citing legal precedents, the Tribunal concluded that a mere delay may not make the assessee liable for penalty under section 272A(2)(c). As the TDS return was filed by the assessee within a reasonable time, the penalty was deemed unjustifiable. Consequently, the penalty was deleted, and the order of the CIT(A) reducing the penalty to the TDS liability amount was found untenable. In the final decision, the Tribunal allowed the assessee's appeal and dismissed the Revenue's appeal. The judgment highlighted the importance of legal interpretations and precedents in determining the leviability of penalties under the Income Tax Act, emphasizing the need for a thorough analysis of relevant provisions and case laws in such matters.
|
