Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + AT Income Tax - 2006 (6) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2006 (6) TMI 159 - AT - Income Tax

Issues:
- Whether interest under sections 234B & 234C of the IT Act should be charged after setting off MAT credit.

Analysis:
1. Issue of Interest Calculation: The Revenue appealed against the CIT(A) order directing to charge interest under sections 234B & 234C of the IT Act after setting off MAT credit. The AO initially calculated interest after allowing MAT credit under section 115JAA. However, the AO later issued a notice under section 154 to rectify this, claiming interest under sections 234B & 234C. The assessee argued that interest should be calculated after allowing MAT credit, as per section 115JAA provisions.

2. Debatable Issue: The Tribunal noted that the issue of allowing set off before charging interest under sections 234B & 234C was debatable. The Tribunal had previously ruled in favor of the assessee on similar issues. It was established that in cases involving debatable issues, rectification under section 154 cannot be done by the AO. The Tribunal emphasized that such issues require detailed arguments and cannot be decided summarily.

3. Appellate Order Analysis: The Tribunal reviewed the CIT(A) order, which extensively analyzed sections 115JAA, 234B, and 234C of the Act. The CIT(A) concluded that set off of MAT paid in earlier years is allowable under section 115JAA. The set off of MAT is against the tax payable, not the total tax amount. The Tribunal agreed with the CIT(A)'s interpretation, stating that allowing set off before charging interest aligns with the logic and provisions of the law. Consequently, the demand raised by the Revenue post rectification was deemed incorrect, and the Tribunal confirmed the CIT(A) order.

4. Decision: Ultimately, the Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal, upholding the CIT(A) decision. The Tribunal concurred with the CIT(A)'s reasoning that set off of MAT credit should be allowed before charging interest under sections 234B & 234C. The Tribunal's decision was based on a comprehensive analysis of relevant legal provisions and logical interpretation of the law.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates