2007 (7) TMI 364 - AT - Income Tax

Summary

Issues Involved:
1. Whether the assessee is engaged in manufacturing or processing for the purpose of claiming deduction u/s 80-IB of the Income-tax Act, 1961.

Summary:

Issue 1: Manufacturing vs. Processing for Deduction u/s 80-IB

The Revenue's appeal contended that the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) erred in holding that the assessee is engaged in the manufacture of specialized polymer alloys in powder form and is entitled to deduction u/s 80-IB of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Assessing Officer (AO) argued that the assessee's activity of pulverizing plastic granules into plastic powder did not qualify as "manufacturing" but merely as "processing," thus disqualifying it from the deduction u/s 80-IB. The AO emphasized the distinction between "manufacturing" and "processing," stating that manufacturing results in a new product with a different identity, whereas processing only changes the physical form of the material.

Upon appeal, the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) elaborately discussed the issue and concluded that the assessee was indeed engaged in manufacturing specialized polymer powders. The Commissioner noted that the assessee uses a combination of various polymers and specialty chemicals to produce distinct polymer alloys in powder form, which have specific industrial applications. The manufacturing process involves multiple steps and specialized machinery, resulting in a new and distinct product that cannot be equated with the raw materials used.

The Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) supported the assessee's case with various case laws, including Kailash Nath v. State of U.P. [1957] 8 STC 358 (SC) and Aspinwall and Co. Ltd. v. CIT [2001] 251 ITR 323 (SC), which recognized the transformation of raw materials into new products as manufacturing. The Tribunal agreed with the Commissioner, noting that the assessee's production process results in a commercially different product with distinct characteristics and qualities, thus satisfying the requirements of manufacturing or producing an article or thing for the purposes of section 80-IB.

The Tribunal also referenced the hon'ble apex court decision in N.C. Budharaja and Co. [1993] 204 ITR 412, which stated that "production" has a wider connotation than "manufacture" and includes bringing into existence new goods by a process that may or may not amount to manufacture. The Tribunal concluded that the assessee's activities qualified as manufacturing, thereby entitling it to the deduction u/s 80-IB.

In conclusion, the Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal and upheld the order of the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals), affirming that the assessee is engaged in manufacturing and is entitled to the deduction u/s 80-IB. The cross objection by the assessee, being supportive of the Commissioner's order, was dismissed as infructuous.