1994 (10) TMI 119 - AT - Income Tax

Adequate Consideration, Assessing Officer, Capital Gains, Charitable Or Religious Trust, Income From Property, Total Income

Issues Involved:
1. Adequacy of sale consideration for property sold to a relative.
2. Adequacy of interest charged on the balance of sale consideration.
3. Adequacy of interest charged on the loan to Children's Benefit Trust.
4. Disallowance of expenses claimed as application of income for charitable purposes.
5. Accumulation of income for specific charitable purposes under section 11(2A).
6. Application of the maximum marginal rate of taxation.
7. Levy of interest under sections 139(8) and 217.

Detailed Analysis:

Issue No. 1: Adequacy of Sale Consideration
The assessee trust sold a property to Vellayan, a relative, for Rs. 3,85,000. The Assessing Officer valued the property at Rs. 4,22,423, concluding that the sale price was inadequate and thus, the trust was not entitled to exemption under section 11. The Commissioner (Appeals) upheld this view. However, the Tribunal found that the sale consideration was adequate based on the Sub-Registrar's valuation of Rs. 3,85,464 and the approved valuer's certificate. The Tribunal held that the lower authorities were not justified in denying the exemption under section 11 based on the sale consideration.

Issue No. 2: Adequacy of Interest Charged on Balance Sale Consideration
The trust charged 9% interest on the unpaid sale consideration, while it charged 15% interest on a loan to Sivagami Family Benefit Trust. The Assessing Officer and Commissioner (Appeals) held that the interest rate was inadequate, leading to denial of exemption under section 11 and an addition of Rs. 1,717 to the income. The Tribunal disagreed, noting that the trust retained a lien on the property and the balance amount was quickly realized. The Tribunal held that 9% interest was adequate and deleted the addition of Rs. 1,717.

Issue No. 3: Adequacy of Interest Charged on Loan to Children's Benefit Trust
The trust charged 10% interest on a loan to Children's Benefit Trust. The lower authorities denied exemption under section 11 and added Rs. 325 to the income, considering the interest rate inadequate. The Tribunal noted that in a previous assessment year, the same issue was decided in favor of the assessee by the Tribunal, which held that the interest rate was adequate and the loan was secured. The Tribunal upheld this view and deleted the addition of Rs. 325.

Issue No. 4: Disallowance of Expenses
The assessee claimed Rs. 24,351 as expenses applied for charitable purposes. The Assessing Officer allowed only Rs. 94 and some donations under section 80G, disallowing the rest. The Commissioner (Appeals) upheld this view. The Tribunal found that donations (except Rs. 1,000 to R.R. Sabha) were for charitable purposes and should be treated as such. However, other expenses related to property dealings were not considered as application of income for charitable purposes. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to re-examine the expenses in light of its observations.

Issue No. 5: Accumulation of Income for Specific Charitable Purposes
The assessee claimed it had resolved to accumulate income for constructing a new building, filing Form No. 10 in 1983-84. The Commissioner (Appeals) dismissed the claim, stating no application was made for 1985-86. The Tribunal noted the need to verify if Form No. 10 was acted upon by the Assessing Officer for 1983-84 and whether the objective was charitable. The Tribunal remitted the issue to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration.

Issue No. 6: Application of Maximum Marginal Rate of Taxation
The Tribunal noted this issue was consequential. It directed the Assessing Officer to examine the issue and apply the maximum marginal rate only to the income not applied for charitable purposes, in accordance with the decision of the Madras Bench 'B' in Tuluva Vellala Association v. ITO.

Issue No. 7: Levy of Interest under Sections 139(8) and 217
The Tribunal noted this issue was also consequential. It allowed the assessee to contest its liability to pay interest when the Assessing Officer passes an order giving effect to the Tribunal's order.

Conclusion:
The Tribunal provided a detailed analysis of each issue, overturning several findings of the lower authorities and remitting some issues for fresh consideration. The assessee's appeal was partly allowed, and the departmental appeal was dismissed.

← Previous Next →