9911796707
|
Home
Issues Involved:
1. Eligibility for exemption under section 11. 2. Application of income for charitable purposes. Detailed Analysis: 1. Eligibility for Exemption Under Section 11 The primary issue in this appeal is whether Shri Aurobindo Ashram Harpagan Workshop Trust is eligible for exemption under section 11 of the Income Tax Act for the assessment year 1975-76. The trust was established by a deed dated 18-12-1967, where Laurence Marshall Pinto settled certain machinery and business operations into the trust. The trust's objectives include aiding the Shri Aurobindo International Centre for Education and the Shri Aurobindo Ashram, both recognized as public charitable trusts under section 11. The Income Tax Officer (ITO) initially denied the exemption, citing the Supreme Court's decision in the Indian Chamber of Commerce v. CIT [1975] 101 ITR 796, which suggested that business activities for profit are taxable. However, this decision was later overruled by the Supreme Court in Addl. CIT v. Surat Art Silk Cloth Manufacturers' Association [1980] 121 ITR 1, which clarified that if the business itself is the subject matter of the trust, it does not constitute an independent activity for profit. The Tribunal found that the trust's business was settled by the settlor and not run independently for profit. The objectives of the trust are aligned with charitable purposes as defined under section 2(15) of the Income Tax Act. Therefore, the Tribunal upheld the first appellate authority's view that the trust is eligible for exemption under section 11, rejecting the ITO's reliance on the Indian Chamber of Commerce case. 2. Application of Income for Charitable Purposes The second issue concerns whether the trust has applied its income for charitable purposes as required under section 11. The ITO argued that only Rs. 1,23,917 out of the total income of Rs. 1,43,820 was applied for charitable purposes, based on cash payments made during the year. The Tribunal examined the trust's accounts and found that the trust had been making contributions to the Shri Aurobindo Ashram for the benefit of the Shri Aurobindo International Centre for Education throughout the year. The trust operates on a mercantile basis, and at the end of the year, the entire profits were credited to the Ashram's account, effectively applying the income for charitable purposes. The Tribunal noted that the outstanding balance recoverable from the Ashram at the end of the year was Rs. 72,182.76, indicating that the trust had advanced more funds than its actual profits, which were Rs. 1,42,812.67. The Tribunal concluded that the entire profits had been applied for charitable purposes through adjustments in the accounts, thus satisfying the requirements of section 11. The Tribunal also distinguished this case from the Nachimuthu Industrial Association v. CIT [1980] 123 ITR 611, where mere advances without proper adjustments were not considered as application of income. In this case, the trust had fully adjusted the advances against the profits, thus meeting the criteria for application of income. Conclusion The Tribunal dismissed the departmental appeal, affirming that Shri Aurobindo Ashram Harpagan Workshop Trust is eligible for exemption under section 11 and that the entire income for the assessment year 1975-76 had been applied for charitable purposes.
|
