Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + AT Income Tax - 1998 (7) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

1998 (7) TMI 135 - AT - Income Tax

Issues:
1. Allowance of customs duty in closing stock under section 43B.
2. Disallowance under section 40A(3) regarding payments exceeding Rs. 2,500.

Issue 1: Allowance of customs duty in closing stock under section 43B:
The assessee claimed a deduction of Rs. 2,51,024 as customs duty paid in relation to the closing stock under section 43B. The assessee argued that this amount should be allowed based on actual payment. However, it was noted that the customs duty had already been debited to the purchase account, and thus, the deduction was not applicable. Citing relevant case laws, it was concluded that allowing this deduction would result in double counting of the same expenditure, which had already been accounted for under 'Purchase.' Therefore, the Tribunal upheld the decision of the CIT(A) and denied the deduction to the assessee.

Issue 2: Disallowance under section 40A(3) regarding payments exceeding Rs. 2,500:
The second issue revolved around the disallowance of Rs. 60,734 under section 40A(3), confirmed by the CIT(A). The AO had disallowed a larger sum, but the CIT(A) upheld a partial disallowance. The assessee argued that the genuineness of payments exceeding Rs. 2,500 was proven, and all parties were regular assessees. The Departmental Representative accepted these facts but relied on different court decisions. The Tribunal analyzed various case laws and highlighted that the genuineness of transactions was not disputed, and all parties were identifiable. Referring to the Supreme Court's decision, it was emphasized that genuine transactions should not fall under the purview of section 40A(3). Ultimately, the Tribunal allowed the appeal in part, holding that disallowances where parties were identified and transactions were genuine should be deleted, in line with the decisions of relevant High Courts and the Supreme Court.

In conclusion, the Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, addressing both issues raised by the assessee regarding the customs duty in closing stock and the disallowance under section 40A(3). The judgment provides a detailed analysis of the legal principles and precedents guiding the decisions on these matters.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates