Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Customs Customs + AT Customs - 1986 (7) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

1986 (7) TMI 247 - AT - Customs

Issues:
Levy of countervailing duty on imported refrigeration unit under Item 29A of the Central Excise Tariff.

Analysis:
The case involved a dispute regarding the levy of countervailing duty on a refrigeration unit imported as part of an anodizing plant. The appellants, clearing agents for the importers, contested the imposition of countervailing duty and sought a refund, claiming that the duty was not applicable to the imported goods. The Assistant Collector rejected the claim due to lack of supporting documents. On appeal, the Appellate Collector upheld the levy of countervailing duty on the refrigeration unit separately, based on its value. The Appellate Collector determined that the refrigeration unit fell under Item 29A of the Central Excise Tariff, which covers a wide range of refrigerating and air-conditioning machinery. The original assessment was deemed appropriate by the Appellate Collector.

The appellants further challenged the Appellate Collector's decision through a revision application, which was subsequently presented as an appeal before the Appellate Tribunal. During the hearing, arguments were presented by both parties. The appellants contended that the refrigeration unit was an integral part of the anodizing plant and not a standalone refrigerating unit assessable under Item 29A of the Central Excise Tariff. They provided additional documentation to support their position.

The respondent maintained that the imported refrigeration unit was correctly subject to countervailing duty under Item 29A of the Central Excise Tariff. The Tribunal examined the case records, including the description of the imported refrigeration system provided by the supplier and correspondence indicating modifications to the design of the hardcoater, which involved relocating the refrigeration unit outside the tank.

Upon review of the manufacturer's catalogue and correspondence, the Tribunal concluded that the imported refrigeration unit constituted a complete refrigerating appliance covered under Item 29A of the Central Excise Tariff. Therefore, the Tribunal upheld the Appellate Collector's decision to levy countervailing duty on the refrigeration unit and dismissed the appeal. The judgment affirmed that the scope of Item 29A encompassed the imported refrigerating unit, justifying the imposition of countervailing duty.

In conclusion, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the respondent, confirming the imposition of countervailing duty on the imported refrigeration unit under Item 29A of the Central Excise Tariff, based on the comprehensive analysis of the case records and relevant tariff provisions.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates