9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
1. Seizure of gold bars and currency under Customs Act, 1962. 2. Validity of seizure based on reasonable belief. 3. Appellant's possession and knowledge of seized items. 4. Legal evidence for confiscation of currency. 5. Confiscation of foreign currency. Analysis: 1. The appeal challenged the order confiscating three gold bars, Indian currency, foreign currency, and State Bank of India Travellers' Cheques under various sections of the Customs Act, 1962. 2. The appellant contested the legality of the seizure, arguing that the search warrant did not specifically mention gold, and there was no reasonable belief to seize the items. However, the tribunal found that the recovery of gold bars with foreign markings justified the seizure under Sec. 123 of the Act. 3. The appellant disclaimed knowledge of the gold found in the room and suitcase, suggesting it could have been planted. The tribunal rejected this argument, noting the exclusive possession of the gold by the appellant, especially the gold found wrapped in the appellant's used clothes. 4. Regarding the Indian currency and Travellers' Cheques, the tribunal found no evidence proving they were proceeds of smuggled goods. Consequently, the confiscation of these items was set aside due to lack of legal evidence. 5. In the case of the foreign currency, the tribunal accepted the appellant's explanation that it represented unexpended foreign exchange released lawfully. As there was no evidence of smuggling, the confiscation of the U.S. and Singapore dollars was deemed unwarranted, and the penalty was reduced from Rs. 60,000 to Rs. 50,000. In conclusion, the tribunal dismissed the appeal except for the modifications mentioned above, upholding the seizure of gold bars while setting aside the confiscation of Indian currency and Travellers' Cheques, as well as the foreign currency, based on the evidence and legal arguments presented during the proceedings.
|
